Abstract:The digital transformation challenges the established frameworks of our societies and economies, with competition law being no exception. Realizing – or sometimes rather assuming – that competition law needs to meet these challenges proactively, lawmakers, courts, agencies and scholars have taken up the task. To give only a few recent examples of topics and actions:<ul class="UnorderedListMarkDash"><li> The German Bundeskartellamt's Facebook decision testifies to the crucial role of data as a competition factor on digital markets. </li><li> The booking, dating and searching platform sagas have been perpetuated of late by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court setting aside the ban on narrow best-price clauses (enge Bestpreisklauseln); by the EU Commission fining Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising; and by EU lawmakers agreeing on a new online platform regulation. No doubt, platform intermediaries, with their gatekeeping role (oftentimes horizontal as well as vertical), the strong network effects they can engender, and the difficulties their multi-sided business models pose to traditional market definition techniques, loom particularly large in a competition law for the digital era. </li><li> The intense enforcement focus on Apple, reflected inter alia by (impending) investigations by both the EU Commission and the DOJ, as well as by the US Supreme Court's readiness to hear a customers' collective action case against the company, is due not least to the business model mega trend of creating digital ecosystems. The seamless integration of multifarious functionalities presents many advantages to users, but also creates the potential for impacting market conduct in an anti-competitive manner. </li><li> Although extensive, in-depth case law on anti-competitive interactions between algorithmic market tools still lies ahead, Eturas, Lufthansa, Topkins and similar cases, in combination with initial economic research on the worrying potential of algorithmic markets to arrive at equilibria of reduced competitiveness, foreshadow a protracted fight for protecting effective competition in this area. </li><li> Negotiations and partly competition law-based litigation between mobility providers – in particular car manufacturers – and ICT patent holders appear as the concomitant of a digital transformation process which connects more traditional sectors to an ICT infrastructure, thereby increasing dynamic efficiency, enabling new market interactions, but also creating the potential for frictions in the competitive process, including hold-up or hold-out related to essential ICT patents. </li></ul>The competition law(-related) toolbox for digital markets contains a broad range of (proposed) instruments. Not all of them are well-tried, some may remain mind games. Among these tools are drastic structural measures, such as breaking up the GAFA giants; an (almost) implemented, more-or-less sector-specific regulation, for instance the EU rules on digital platforms or geo-blocking; further-reaching regulatory proposals, such as an access regime for Connected Mobility data or a code of digital conduct to be implemented by all players holding a strategic market status; concepts at the intersection of competition law and other legal areas, e.g. GDPR data portability or competition law-based compulsory IP licenses; recommendations for revamping the pillars at the core of the competition law framework, such as traditional market power thresholds for intervention or the hitherto lenient approach towards tacit (algorithmic) collusion; and finally a set of more-or-less pioneering provisions in core competition law which allow, inter alia, for the definition of markets in which no money changes hands, for attributing market power to digital ecosystems based on a combination of network effects and lock-in, and for initiating merger control based on other criteria than turnover thresholds.

Excessive Data Collection: Privacy Considerations and Abuse of Dominance in the Era of Big Data

The Implications of Big Data and Privacy on Competition Analysis in Merger Control and The Controversial Competition-Data Protection Interface

The Privacy/Antitrust Curse: Insights from GDPR Application in Competition Law Proceedings

Taming Tech Giants: The Neglected Interplay Between Competition Law and Data Protection (Privacy) Law

Collective Data Harms at the Crossroads of Data Protection and Competition Law: Moving Beyond Individual Empowerment

Big Data and Competition Policy: Market Power, Personalised Pricing and Advertising

Direct Consumer Influence—The Missing Strategy to Integrate Data Privacy Preferences into the Market

Big Data and Digital Markets Contestability: Theory of Harm and Data Access Remedies

Regulating Access to Big Data? – Between Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Economic Regulation

Enhanced Privacy Duties for Dominant Technology Companies

The Strengthening Liaison between Data Protection, Antitrust and Consumer Law in the German and Italian Big Data-Driven Economies

Multisided Platforms, Big Data, and a Little Antitrust Policy

Competition Law for the Digital Era – An Adventurous Journey

Transparency in a Digitally Intertwined World: A Hybrid Approach to Consumers’ Protection

Executive Summary of the Preliminary Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data

Digital Crossroads: The Intersection of Competition Law and Data Privacy

Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task?

Regulating BigTech: An Investigation on the Admissibility of Article 114 TFEU as the Appropriate Legal Basis for the Digital Markets Act based on an Analysis of the Objectives and Regulatory Mechanisms

Adtech and Real-Time Bidding under European Data Protection Law

Conceptualizing Big Tech As ‘Modern Bigness’ and Its Implications for European Competition Law Submission in Reaction to the Call for Contributions – Shaping Competition Policy in the Era of Digitalization

Data Profiteering: Corporate Social Responsibility and Privacy Law Lost in Data Monetization and National Security