CXCR4 mutation subtypes impact response and survival outcomes in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia treated with ibrutinib

Jorge J. Castillo,Lian Xu,Joshua N. Gustine,Andrew Keezer,Kirsten Meid,Toni E. Dubeau,Xia Liu,Maria G. Demos,Amanda Kofides,Nicholas Tsakmaklis,Jiaji G. Chen,Manit Munshi,Maria L. Guerrera,Gloria G. Chan,Christopher J. Patterson,Guang Yang,Zachary R. Hunter,Steven P. Treon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16088
2019-07-03
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:<p>Ibrutinib is associated with response rate of 90% and median progression‐free survival (PFS) in excess of 5 years in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) patients. <i>CXCR4</i> mutations are detected in 30–40% of patients with WM and associate with lower rates of response and shorter PFS to ibrutinib therapy. Both frameshift (<i>CXCR4</i><sup>FS</sup>) and nonsense (<i>CXCR4</i><sup>NS</sup>) <i>CXCR4</i> mutations have been described. The impact of these mutations on outcomes to ibrutinib have not been evaluated in WM patients. We studied consecutive patients with a diagnosis of WM, on ibrutinib therapy, for the presence of <i>CXCR4</i><sup>FS</sup> and <i>CXCR4</i><sup>NS</sup> mutations and evaluated the differences in response and PFS between groups. Of 180 patients, 68 patients (38%) had <i>CXCR4</i> mutations; 49 (27%) had <i>CXCR4</i><sup>NS</sup> and 19 (11%) had <i>CXCR4</i><sup>FS</sup> mutations. In multivariate models, patients with <i>CXCR4</i><sup>NS</sup> had lower odds of major response (Odds ratio 0·25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·12–0·53; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001) and worse PFS (Hazard ratio 4·02, 95% CI 1·95–8·26; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001) than patients without <i>CXCR4</i> mutations. <i>CXCR4</i><sup>FS</sup> was not associated with worse major response or PFS rates than patients without <i>CXCR4</i> mutations. Our results suggest different response and PFS rates to ibrutinib for WM patients with <i>CXCR4</i><sup>NS</sup> and <i>CXCR4</i><sup>FS</sup>, and advocate in favour of <i>CXCR4</i> mutational testing as well as <i>CXCR4</i>‐directed therapy.</p>
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?