Biomarker analysis of the ASPEN study comparing zanubrutinib to ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Constantine S. Tam,Stephen Opat,Shirley P. D'Sa,Wojciech Jurczak,Hui-Peng Lee,Gavin Cull,Roger G. Owen,Paula Marlton,Björn E. Wahlin,Ramon Garcia-Sanz,Helen McCarthy,Stephen P. Mulligan,Alessandra Tedeschi,Jorge J. Castillo,Jaroslaw Czyz,Carlos Fernández de Larrea,David Belada,Edward N. Libby,Jeffrey V. Matous,Marina Motta,Tanya Siddiqi,Monica Tani,Marek Trněný,Monique C. Minnema,Christian Buske,Véronique Leblond,Steven P. Treon,Judith Trotman,Binghao Wu,Yiling Yu,Zhirong Shen,Wai Y. Chan,Jingjing Schneider,Heather Allewelt,Aileen Cohen,Meletios-Athanasios A. Dimopoulos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010906
IF: 7.642
2024-02-08
Blood Advances
Abstract:The phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) compared Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Post-hoc biomarker analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing on pretreatment bone marrow samples from 98 zanubrutinib-treated and 92 ibrutinib-treated patients with mutated (MUT) MYD88 and 20 zanubrutinib-treated patients with wild-type (WT) MYD88. Of 329 mutations in 52 genes, mutations in CXCR4 (25.7%), TP53 (24.8%), ARID1A (15.7%), and TERT (9.0%) were most common. TP53MUT, ARID1AMUT, and TERTMUT were associated with higher rates of CXCR4MUT (P<0.05). Patients with CXCR4MUT (frameshift [FS] or nonsense [NS] mutations) had lower very good partial response and complete response rate (VGPR+CR) (17.0% vs 37.2%, P=0.020) and longer time to response (11.1 vs 8.4 months) than CXCR4WT BTKi-treated patients. CXCR4NS was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; HR=3.39, P=0.017) in ibrutinib-treated, but not zanubrutinib-treated patients (HR=0.67, P=0.598), but VGPR+CR rates were similar between treatment groups (14.3% vs 15.4%). Compared to ibrutinib, zanubrutinib-treated patients with CXCR4NS had a favorable major response rate (MRR; 85.7% vs 53.8%, P=0.09) and PFS (HR=0.30, P=0.093). In patients with TP53MUT, significantly lower MRR was observed in ibrutinib- (63.6% vs 85.7%, P=0.04) but not zanubrutinib-treated patients (80.8% vs 81.9%, P=0.978). In TP53MUT, compared to ibrutinib, zanubrutinib-treated patients had higher VGPR+CR (34.6% vs 13.6%, P<0.05), numerically improved MRR (80.8% vs 63.6%, P=0.11), and longer PFS (not reached vs 44.2 months, HR=0.66, P=0.37). Collectively, WM patients with CXCR4MUT or TP53MUT had worse prognosis compared to patients with WT alleles and zanubrutinib led to better clinical outcomes.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?