PEEP titration in moderate to severe ARDS: plateau versus transpulmonary pressure

Marie Bergez,Nicolas Fritsch,David Tran-Van,Tahar Saghi,Tan Bounkim,Ariane Gentile,Philippe Labadie,Bruno Fontaine,Alexandre Ouattara,Hadrien Rozé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0554-3
IF: 10.318
2019-07-16
Annals of Intensive Care
Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Although lung protection with low tidal volume and limited plateau pressure (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>plat</sub>) improves survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (ARDS), the best way to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is still debated.</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">This study aimed to compare two strategies using individual PEEP based on a maximum <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>plat</sub> (28–30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, the Express group) or on keeping end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure positive (0–5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>Lexpi</sub> group). We estimated alveolar recruitment (Vrec), end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar distension based on elastance-related end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>L,EL</sub>).</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">Nineteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 150 mmHg) were included with a baseline PEEP of 7.0 ± 1.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and a PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> of 91.2 ± 31.2 mmHg. PEEP and oxygenation increased significantly from baseline with both protocols; PEEP Express group was 14.2 ± 3.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O versus 16.7 ± 5.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>Lexpi</sub> group. No patient had the same PEEP with the two protocols. Vrec was higher with the latter protocol (299 [0 to 875] vs. 222 [47 to 483] ml, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> = 0.049) and correlated with improved oxygenation (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.45, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> = 0.002). Two and seven patients in the Express and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>L,expi</sub> groups, respectively, had <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>L,EL</sub> &gt; 25 cmH<sub>2</sub>O.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">There is a great heterogeneity of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>Lexpi</sub> when <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>plat</sub> is used to titrate PEEP but with limited risk of over-distension. A PEEP titration for a moderate positive level of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em><sub>Lexpi</sub> might slightly improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation but increases the risk of over-distension in one-third of patients.</p>
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?