Decades Under the Influence: Shifting the PEEP Paradigm in ARDS

Brian J Ring
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12435
2024-09-27
Respiratory Care
Abstract:The titration of PEEP in ARDS has been a topic of debate since its application was documented by Ashbaugh and colleagues1 nearly 60 years ago. How much PEEP is too much PEEP? Is a physiologic PEEP of 5 cm H2O real (spoiler alert: it is not)? Is the low/high PEEP table approach optimal? Are all patients with ARDS necessarily recruitable? Nonetheless, decades later, clinicians continue to circle issues concerning the application, titration, and physiology of PEEP. Perhaps as we know the application of PEEP today, Frumin et al2 were among the first to illustrate the effect of PEEP on oxygenation indices during ventilation in the late 1950s. In their work, Frumin et al demonstrated that a PEEP of approximately 7 cm H2O supported consistent blood-oxygen levels throughout an elective surgical procedure compared to the absence of PEEP.2 Beyond what one may consider as healthy lungs as the subjects in the work by Frumin and colleagues, Ashbaugh et al were pioneers concerning the application of PEEP during mechanical ventilation in subjects with what was termed adult respiratory distress syndrome in the mid-1960s. Utilizing the relatively new Engström universal ventilator (Fig. 1), 5 subjects with heterogenous etiology of ARDS received PEEP ranging from 5–10 cm H2O, all of whom demonstrated an increase in oxygenation indicies.1,3 Of the subjects not receiving PEEP, only 2 of the 7 survived.1 Consistent with how we understand and utilize the physiological principles of PEEP in ARDS today, Ashbaugh et al summarized the use of PEEP in ARDS as follows:1 Fig. 1. The Engstrom ventilator is a volume controlled device that provided the use what was called an "expiratory retard control" on the expiratory manifold of the ventilator. This function allowed for the titration and application ... Correspondence: Brian J Ring PhD RRT, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Medical Science Building, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Rm 2108B, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558. e-mail: ringba{at}ucmail.uc.edu
respiratory system,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?