Abstract:The science of modelling choice preferences has evolved into an interdisciplinary field contributing to several branches of microeconomics and mathematical psychology. As theories in decision science and related fields mature, descriptive theories have emerged to explain systematic violations of rationality through cognitive mechanisms underlying the thought processes that guide human behaviour. Cognitive limitations are not, however, solely responsible for systematic deviations from rationality and there is a growing body of literature exploring the effect of visceral factors as the more dominant drivers. This study builds on the existing literature by investigating the impact of anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, hunger, energy, tiredness and stress on three distinct elements that define risk preference: utility, decision weights and loss aversion. By decomposing the impact of visceral factors on risk preference, I am able to provide evidence supporting the proposition that a portion of the variability in individual choice preferences can be explained by interacting visceral states. My findings suggest that visceral factors have the strongest effect on loss aversion, which is a major factor in how people code and evaluate financial outcomes. Anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, energy and tiredness each affect five or more of the model parameters, while hunger and stress are significant only in their interaction with other visceral factors. I also provide evidence to show that the generalized approaches to characterizing visceral factors and risk preference are too broad to be descriptively meaningful. The results of this study show that emotions and other drive states effect the way people process and interpret information, which is crucial in informing decision-makers of the sources and consequences of irrational behaviour. These findings will be of immediate interest to wealth management specialists, public relations advisers as well as to engineers in designing socially intelligent machines capable of interacting more effectively with humans.

The effect of emotion on risky decision making in the context of prospect theory: a comprehensive literature review

A multinational analysis of how emotions relate to economic decisions regarding time or risk

Risk and emotion: measuring the effect of emotions and other visceral factors on decision making under risk

Cooperative versus competitive influences of emotion and cognition on decision making: A primer for psychiatry research

Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences

Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential

The Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Emotion on Rational Person Behavior in the Decision Neuroscience Perspective

Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on risk decision making

The role of emotion in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior

Toward a Model of Risky Decisions: Synergistic Effect of Affect Intensity and Affective Processing on Risk-Seeking As a Function of Decision Domain

Description‐experience gap in choice under risk: Are emotions involved?

Understanding Risky Behavior: The Influence of Cognitive, Emotional and Hormonal Factors on Decision-Making under Risk

Passionate rationalism: the role of emotion in decision making

Incidental Emotions Influence Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation

An Empirical Review of Behavioral Decision Making in the Financial Markets

Prospect theory or construal level theory? Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions

The Effect of Emotion and Time Pressure on Risk Decision-Making

Role of Emotions in Risk Perception

Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk

The Value of Emotion: How Does Episodic Prospection Modulate Delay Discounting?

Research on the effect of emotion on decision-making