Book Review: The Cosmic Common Good: Religious Grounds for Ecological Ethics. By Daniel P. Scheid
Elizabeth A. Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563917732222m
2017-12-01
Abstract:could be seen as providing such vindication of God. Thus, while most of her readers are familiar with Augustinian and Thomistic theodicies, B. explains to non-specialists how Origen’s “two creations theory,” according to which humans spiritually have choice despite the ex nihilo creation of the physical world, opens the door for free will among the Church Fathers (49–50), or shows how a Kierkegaardian teleological suspension of the ethical in the self’s bid to become authentic can also be creatively construed as the overcoming of boredom, “the root of all evil” (147). Yet B.’s broad treatment sometimes misses critical details. For example, this very phrase from Either/Or is in fact voiced by a pseudonym, the aesthete Johannes the Seducer, not Kierkegaard himself. B. also occasionally forces connections to preserve historical continuity. Her section on “literary explorations in the Nineteenth Century,” where she ties liberal Protestantism to the gothic literature of the Romantics, seems a particularly hard sell (146–48). Finally, some critical works are not treated, such as the most poignant of the empirically sensitive, nonspeculative theodicies of the modern era, C. S. Lewis’s A Grief Observed, where Lewis ties flourishing to pain in a manner which could have served as an effective rejoinder to Leibniz’s Enlightenment “best of all possible worlds” defense of the divine. Nevertheless, for clarity of classic texts as varied as the Book of Job (12–14), Augustine’s City of God (65–66), Luther’s The Bondage of the Will (96), and even John Hick’s seminal God of Love from the twentieth century (171–73), one could scarcely write more succinctly or accessibly than B. has done. In the end, the case for a “trajectory,” the explicit purpose of the volume as indicated by its subtitle, is duly made.
Environmental Science,Philosophy