Abstract:Standards and Codes of Practice for designing new constructions and for assessing and strengthening existing ones are usually based on uniform hazard maps, where different Limit States (LSs) are associated with different hazard-exceedance probabilities. This approach yields non-homogeneous LS-exceedance probabilities across a territory, thus failing to achieve the goal of uniform risk throughout a territory. Such lack of uniformity stems from estimating the probability of failure using capacity and demand models. If the capacity of new constructions-or the capacity increase of strengthened existing constructions-are designed based on a prescribed hazard-exceedance probability, then the seismic risk depends on both the structure (depending on the design philosophy and corresponding design objectives), through the capacity model, and the location, through the hazard model. The aim of this study is threefold. First, it provides a seismic probability assessment formulation and a risk-targeted intensity measure based on a linear model in log-log coordinates of the hazard, under the assumption of log-normal capacity and demand. The proposed framework introduces a factor that multiplies the code hazard-based demand to account either for intentional (from design) over-capacity or for undesired (e.g., in existing constructions) under-capacity. Second, this paper shows an application to peak ground accelerations in Europe considering parameters taken from Standards and Codes of Practice. The developed framework is used to determine the risk-target levels of peak ground acceleration used for design in Europe, for both new and existing constructions. Third, the obtained target risk levels are used to determine a risk-based intensity modification factor and a risk-based mean return period modification factor, which can be readily implemented in current Standards to achieve risk-targeted design actions, with equal LS-exceedance probability across the territory. The framework is independent of the chosen hazard-based intensity measure, be it the commonly used peak ground acceleration or any other measure. The results highlight that in large areas of Europe the design peak ground acceleration should be increased to achieve the proposed seismic risk target and that this is particularly significant for existing constructions, given their larger uncertainties and typical low capacity with respect to the code hazard-based demand.

Formulation of risk‐targeted seismic action for the force‐based seismic design of structures

Behavior and Design of Earthquake Resistant Concrete Structure

Comparison of methods to develop risk-targeted seismic design maps

Towards risk-targeted seismic hazard models for Europe

Evaluating alternative approaches for the seismic design of structures

Exploring Risk-Targeted Ground Motions and Seismic Design Spectra for Mainland China

A multi‐objective performance‐based seismic design framework for building typologies

Integrating expected loss and collapse risk in performance-based seismic design of structures

A Method for Determination of Seismic Target Performance Level of Reinforced Concrete Frames

Direct loss‐based seismic design of reinforced concrete frame and wall structures

Value based seismic design of structures using performance assessment by the endurance time method

Uniform-risk-targeted Seismic Design for Collapse Safety of Building Structures

Collapse-based seismic design method

Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Tehran and Surrounding Areas

Life cycle cost‐based optimization framework for seismic design and target safety quantification of dual steel buildings with buckling‐restrained braces

Response prediction and its determination of design value for RC frame structures under uniform risk spectra

Raising the bar in seismic design: cost–benefit analysis of alternative design methodologies and earthquake-resistant technologies

Multi-Level Response Modification Factors for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tunnel-Form Building Structures

Selection of hazard-consistent ground motions for risk-based analyses of structures

A framework on seismic design of structures: robust structural design and loss estimation

Performance-based versus conventional seismic design: comparative assessment on a 4-story RC moment frame