Abstract:We systematically investigate issues due to mis-specification that arise in estimating causal effects when (treatment) interference is informed by a network available pre-intervention, i.e., in situations where the outcome of a unit may depend on the treatment assigned to other units. We develop theory for several forms of interference through the concept of exposure neighborhood, and develop the corresponding semi-parametric representation for potential outcomes as a function of the exposure neighborhood. Using this representation, we extend the definition of two popular classes of causal estimands, marginal and average causal effects, to the case of network interference. We characterize the bias and variance one incurs when combining classical randomization strategies (namely, Bernoulli, Completely Randomized, and Cluster Randomized designs) and estimators (namely, difference-in-means and Horvitz-Thompson) used to estimate average treatment effect and on the total treatment effect, under misspecification due to interference. We illustrate how difference-in-means estimators can have arbitrarily large bias when estimating average causal effects, depending on the form and strength of interference, which is unknown at design stage. Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimators are unbiased when the correct weights are specified. Here, we derive the HT weights for unbiased estimation of different estimands, and illustrate how they depend on the design, the form of interference, which is unknown at design stage, and the estimand. More importantly, we show that HT estimators are in-admissible for a large class of randomization strategies, in the presence of interference. We develop new model-assisted and model-dependent strategies to improve HT estimators, and we develop new randomization strategies for estimating the average treatment effect and total treatment effect.

Opening the Blackbox of Treatment Interference: Tracing Treatment Diffusion through Network Analysis

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Causal Inference Under Network Interference: A Framework for Experiments on Social Networks

Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interference

Causal Inference under Networked Interference and Intervention Policy Enhancement

Causal inference on networks under continuous treatment interference

Heterogeneous Treatment and Spillover Effects under Clustered Network Interference

Causal Inference with Noncompliance and Unknown Interference

Estimation and inference of average treatment effects under heterogeneous additive treatment effect model

Independent-Set Design of Experiments for Estimating Treatment and Spillover Effects under Network Interference

Treatment Effect Estimation Amidst Dynamic Network Interference in Online Gaming Experiments

Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in Networks.

A systematic investigation of classical causal inference strategies under mis-specification due to network interference

Spatial Interference Detection in Treatment Effect Model

Causal Inference under Network Interference Using a Mixture of Randomized Experiments

Modeling Interference Via Symmetric Treatment Decomposition

Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interference

Treatment Effect Accounting for Network Changes

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Social Networks

Causal inference for interfering units with cluster and population level treatment allocation programs

Exploiting Neighborhood Interference with Low Order Interactions under Unit Randomized Design