Abstract:The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured as premature responses. The 5CSRTT has been adapted for the use in touchscreen operant boxes. We assessed long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this touchscreen task. Mice were trained on the baseline 5CSRTT, then tested using three versions of the task: reduced stimulus duration (SD), variable inter‐trial interval (ITI), and elongated 9 s ITI. We then tested the performance following administration of pharmacological agents known to affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with a 9 s ITI. A reduced SD impacted attention but had no effect on premature responding. Both the variable and 9 s ITI increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using a 9 s ITI. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges. The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured by premature responses. The task has been adapted for mice in touchscreen operant boxes, which is thought to offer improved test–retest reliability. Few studies have assessed the long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this version of the task. We used the touchscreen 5CSRTT to conduct longitudinal testing of stability of premature responding following repeated behavioral and pharmacological manipulations. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a baseline version of the 5CSRTT. They were then tested on versions of the task in which the stimulus duration was reduced, and inter‐trial intervals were elongated or varied within‐session. Premature responding was subsequently tested following administration of pharmacological agents known to bi‐directionally affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with elongated inter‐trial intervals. A reduced stimulus duration impacted attention, with reduced accuracy and increased omissions, but had no effect on premature responding. Both elongating and varying the inter‐trial interval within‐session increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding, though less than previously reported in rats. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using an elongated inter‐trial interval. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges.

Accuracy of different modalities of reaction time testing: Implications for online cognitive assessment tools

Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile

How Participants Respond to Computer Delays

Reaction time effects in lab- versus Web-based research: Experimental evidence

Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18–45 year old

Influential Factors and Preliminary Reference Data for a Clinically Feasible, Functional Reaction Time Assessment: The Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time

Exploring Human Response Times to Combinations of Audio, Haptic, and Visual Stimuli from a Mobile Device

Naturalistic assessment of reaction time variability in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease

Visual tests, touch responses: Computer-based neuropsychological tools

Development of a Mobile Phone App for Measuring Striking Response Time in Combat Sports: Cross-Sectional Validation Study

Reliably Measuring Learning-Dependent Distractor Suppression with Eye Tracking

Computer Timing Technology in Psychological Experiment Studies

Comparison of anticipation skills and reaction time in normal adults using a constructed anticipation timer

Assessing the stability of responding of male mice in the touchscreen 5 choice serial reaction time task: Focus on premature responding

Assessment of the Relevance and Reliability of Reaction Time Tests Performed in Immersive Virtual Reality by Mixed Martial Arts Fighters

Monitoring reaction time to digital device in the very-old to detect early cognitive decline

Evaluating the Effects of Different Cognitive Tasks on Autonomic Nervous System Responses: Implementation of a High‐Precision, Low‐Cost Complementary Method

Testing for Aberrant Behavior in Response Time Modeling

Online Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: A Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study (Preprint)

Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration

Vibrotactile Display Design: Quantifying The Importance Of Age And Various Factors On Reaction Times