Abstract:The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured as premature responses. The 5CSRTT has been adapted for the use in touchscreen operant boxes. We assessed long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this touchscreen task. Mice were trained on the baseline 5CSRTT, then tested using three versions of the task: reduced stimulus duration (SD), variable inter‐trial interval (ITI), and elongated 9 s ITI. We then tested the performance following administration of pharmacological agents known to affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with a 9 s ITI. A reduced SD impacted attention but had no effect on premature responding. Both the variable and 9 s ITI increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using a 9 s ITI. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges. The five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) is a test of attention that provides a well‐validated ancillary measure of impulsive action, measured by premature responses. The task has been adapted for mice in touchscreen operant boxes, which is thought to offer improved test–retest reliability. Few studies have assessed the long‐term stability of performance, including premature responding in this version of the task. We used the touchscreen 5CSRTT to conduct longitudinal testing of stability of premature responding following repeated behavioral and pharmacological manipulations. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a baseline version of the 5CSRTT. They were then tested on versions of the task in which the stimulus duration was reduced, and inter‐trial intervals were elongated or varied within‐session. Premature responding was subsequently tested following administration of pharmacological agents known to bi‐directionally affect attention and impulsive action—cocaine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine. Mice were lastly re‐tested 6 months later using the 5CSRTT with elongated inter‐trial intervals. A reduced stimulus duration impacted attention, with reduced accuracy and increased omissions, but had no effect on premature responding. Both elongating and varying the inter‐trial interval within‐session increased premature responses. Mice showed similar and stable levels of increased premature responding 6 months later. Cocaine increased premature responding, though less than previously reported in rats. Atomoxetine reduced premature responding. Yohimbine had no effect on premature responding in the baseline task but decreased premature responding when tested using an elongated inter‐trial interval. Overall, these results highlight that the touch screen adaptation of the 5CSRTT is an effective method for longitudinal testing of attention and impulsive action and remains sensitive to performance changes arising from repeated pharmacological and behavioral challenges.

Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile

Accuracy of different modalities of reaction time testing: Implications for online cognitive assessment tools

Mobile toolbox (MTB) remote measures of executive function and processing speed: development and validation

Naturalistic assessment of reaction time variability in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease

Reliability and Validity of Ambulatory Cognitive Assessments

Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18–45 year old

Influential Factors and Preliminary Reference Data for a Clinically Feasible, Functional Reaction Time Assessment: The Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time

Mayo Normative Studies: regression-based normative data for remote self-administration of the Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite and validation in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and dementia

Decision-Making Time Analysis for Assessing Processing Speed in Athletes during Motor Reaction Tasks

A mobile digital device proficiency performance test for cognitive clinical research

Response time and response time variability as indicators of response quality during static automated perimetry

Assessment of Autism and ADHD: A Comparative Analysis of Drawing Velocity Profiles and the NEPSY Test

Validation of a Remote and Fully Automated Story Recall Task to Assess for Early Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Longitudinal Case-Control Observational Study

Reproducibility of Frequency-Dependent Low Frequency Fluctuations in Reaction Time over Time and Across Tasks.

App-based saccade latency and error determination across the adult age spectrum

Testing for Aberrant Behavior in Response Time Modeling

Response Latencies During Confrontation Picture Naming in Aphasia: Are Proxy Measurements Sufficient?

Validity and reliability of a digital solution for cognitive assessment: The Brain on Track®

Electrodermal lability, errors, and reaction times: an examination of the motor impulsivity hypothesis

Assessing the stability of responding of male mice in the touchscreen 5 choice serial reaction time task: Focus on premature responding

Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration