Study of the characteristics of the ashing process of straw/coal combustion
Cuiping Wang,Yajue Wu,Qing Liu,Hairui Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.04.018
IF: 7.4
2011-01-01
Fuel
Abstract:Highlights ► This paper presented an experimental study of the characteristics of the ashing process during straw/coal co-combustion. ► The proximate analysis showed that the blends with coal content between 5 wt.% and 15 wt.% had the effect of reducing the ash quantity. And the blends with coal content between 20 wt.% and 90 wt.% demonstrated effect of promoting ash and therefore increasing the ash quantity. The blend with 10 wt.% coal has a prominent ash inhibiting effect and the sample with 40 wt.% coal has the highest ash promotion. The ashing processes of those two blends were studied in detail in a Thermal Gravity Analyzer with the comparison to the ones of straw and coal. ► The ash fusion points were measured. The oxides contents of the ashes were measured by Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence spectrometry (EDX). And the minerals composition were examined by X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD). ► The experiments had identified that with the blend of 5–15 wt.% coal, the potassium K was accelerated into gaseous products during the volatile release stage at the temperature of 250–380 °C and therefore created an ash inhibition effect. The K 2 O content in the ash of the blend with 10 wt.% coal is lowest and minimum minerals with K element was found in this sample. ► The mechanisms of ash promotion effect for blends with coal content greater than 20 wt.% was due to the slow thermal reaction with oxidant and the eliminated decomposition of CaCO 3 and CaSO 4 at pyrolysis stage since the coupling reactions of Ca and Al produced stable CaAl 8 Fe 4 O 19 KSi 3 AlO 8 during combustion stage and resulted in much less gaseous products than expected at high temperature. The evidences revealed the mechanisms of the coupling reactions of the coal and straw on the ashing stages. Abstract An experimental study was performed to examine the ashing process during straw/coal co-combustion to determine the effect of the blending ratio on ash products. A total of eleven blending samples with coal contents varying from 5 wt.% to 90 wt.% along with pure wheat straw and pure coal samples were tested to determine the ash fusion points, oxide contents and mineral contents. Blends with coal contents between 5 wt.% and 15 wt.% were able to inhibit ash and reduced ash quantity. Blends with coal contents greater than 20 wt.% promoted ash and increased ash quantity. Thermal decomposition processes during the combustion and ash pyrolysis of the blends with 10 wt.% and 40 wt.% and the samples of pure coal and pure wheat straw were simulated using a Thermal Gravity Analyser. The results indicated that the ashing processes of the blends were influenced by the coupling reactions of the minerals in the straw and coal. When using a blend of 10 wt.% coal, more potassium (K) was accelerated into gaseous products during the volatile releasing and firing stage, which caused an ash quantity reduction effect. K 2 O content was lowest in this sample, and a minimum amount of K compounds was detected. With a blend of 40 wt.% coal, because the coupling reactions of Ca and Al produced stable minerals of CaAl 8 Fe 4 O 19 and KSi 3 AlO 8 , less CaCO 3 and CaSO 4 were produced. Thermal decomposition at the ash pyrolysis stage was very weak and resulted in much less gaseous products than what would be expected at high temperatures; therefore, more ash residues remained. Keywords Coal Wheat straw Co-firing Ashing behaviour Coupling reactions 1 Introduction Biomass is considered to be carbon natural and generally contains less sulphur and nitrogen than coal; therefore, it can be co-fired with coal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and other pollutant emissions [1] . However, the co-firing of coal with biomass (usually straw or wood dust) has also encountered certain operational problems, including low ash fusion points, ash deposit and ash corrosion. Straw has higher potassium and chlorine contents than coal [2] , which produces lower fusion point minerals and causes more deposits [3–6] . The characteristics of ash fusion points, ash deposition and the mobility of special alkali metals in co-firing, have been studied with different types of biomass/coal mixtures [7–11] . The complexity of ash deposit problems and ash corrosion evolution caused by co-firing was first discussed by Robson et al. [12] . Experiments with wide ranges of blending ratios were performed to study ash deposit rates and the corrosive components in the ash. It was emphasised that the interaction between minerals from coal and biomass was an important factor in the ash deposit rate. Aho et al. [13] also found that chlorate in biomass and sulphate in coal were the most significant components in producing ash products and the corresponding corrosion properties. There were clear differences in the mineral contents between coal and biomass. Vassilev et al. [14] performed a comparative study of the mineral differences of biomass and coal and found some possible reversible coupling reactions between the minerals coming from coal and chlorate in biomass during the co-firing or co-pyrolysis processes. The ash fusion points and corrosion characteristics were determined by the ash compounds, which were mainly influenced by the process temperature [15–17] . However, there remains a lack of further detailed investigations on the conditions of the coupling reactions between minerals from coal and chlorate in biomass and their influence on ash products. This study aimed to examine some of the consequences of the coupling reactions on ash compositions through the experimental testing of ash compositions by systematically varying the blending ratio of the biomass/coal fuel samples. The optimum blending conditions for minimising pollutant emissions and the blending conditions that produced low ash corrosion properties were examined experimentally. 2 Materials and experimental methods 2.1 Fuel samples and proximate analysis The fuel samples used in the study consisted of blends of wheat straw and coal that are typically used for power generation. The wheat straw is taken from the North China Plain and the coal from Yanzhou Coal Mine in Shandong Province of China. The study tested a total of 11 blending samples with coal contents varying from 5 wt.% to 90 wt.% along with pure wheat straw and pure coal samples. A proximate analysis was performed on all of the samples in a Muffle furnace using the slow ashing process at a terminal temperature of 815 °C. The results of the proximate analysis of the coal and straw samples are listed in Table 1 . The thermal ratio of coal to straw was 1.95. Fig. 1 shows a comparison of the results of the proximate analysis for all of the samples. The proximate analysis showed that the moisture content in the blended samples decreased linearly with the increase in coal content. However, the contents of the volatile, ash and fixed carbon did not show a perfect linear relationship with coal content in the sample. The results indicated that there may have been some coupling reactions that influenced the volatile, ash and fixed carbon in the proximate analysis. The nonlinear relationship of the ash quantity was analysed by a D factor, which was defined as the ratio of the actual measured ash content to the theoretical calculated ash content and based on the proportional contributions from the coal and straw contents, assuming that there were no interactions between the coal and straw during combustion. (1) D = A blend A coal · x + A straw · ( 100 - x ) where A blend is the experimental measured ash content of the blend tested, and A coal and A straw are the ash contents of the coal and straw that were determined by the proximate analysis, respectively. x is the coal content in the blend, wt.%. The D factor is plotted in Fig. 2 . An ash inhibition effect was found when the coal was between 5 and 15 wt.%, and the value of the D factor was less than one. However, the ash content began to exceed the expected theoretical level, and the D factor was greater than one when the coal content was greater than 20 wt.%. This had the effect of promoting ash. The ash promotion effect reached its maximum when the coal content was about 40 wt.%. The maximum ash reduction and ash enhancement were approximately 5%. Based on the proximate analysis, the blend with 10 wt.% coal was selected for a further investigation of the ash inhibition effect, and the blend with 40 wt.% was selected for an investigation of the ash promotion effect in comparison with the ashing processes of coal and straw. 2.2 Ash fusion point tests The ash fusion points of all the samples were determined according to the GB/T 219-2008 standard. The characteristic temperatures corresponding to the status of the ash were determined, which included deforming temperature (DT), softening temperature (ST), hemispherical fusion temperature (HT) and flowing temperature (FT). 2.3 Ashing process simulation in a Thermal Gravity Analyser (TGA) The ashing processes of the samples with 10 wt.% and 40 wt.% along with pure wheat straw and pure coal were experimentally examined in a Thermal Gravity Analyser (TGA). The TGA used in this study was an STA 449 C-type (NETZSCH). The sample weight was 100 mg each time. The co-firing process can be generally divided into two stages; these included ashing when the fuel reacted with an oxidant and a subsequent ash pyrolysis process in flue gas at higher temperatures. The two-stage ashing processes were simulated by varying the conditions of the inlet into the TGA, and the temperature ranges were 250–800 °C and above 800 °C. At the first stage, the inlet was set to simulate air with 80 vol.% of N 2 and 20 vol.% of O 2 at a rate of 0.05 m 3 /h. The heating rate was maintained at 20 °C/min until the temperature of 800 °C. Then, the oxygen in the inlet was cut off, and the flowrate of the nitrogen was increased to 0.05 m 3 /h. When the temperature reached 1300 °C as the same heating rate, the temperature of the sample was maintained at 1300 °C for 10 min. 2.4 Ash analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence spectrometry The ashes produced from the approximate analysis were examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The distribution of important elements in the ash samples were also examined using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence spectrometry (EDX). In this work, both high-vacuum and low-vacuum electron microscopes were used. 2.5 Ash analysis using X-ray powder diffractometry The main crystalline compounds in the ash samples from the proximate analysis were identified using qualitative D8 ADVANCE X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD) with characteristic Cu radiation and a scintillation detector. The scanning angle was set to a range of 10.000°–80.000° at steps of 0.02°. Five sample ashes were grounded into particles with a size of less than 60 μm (all passing through the 80 μm screening) according to the XRD measurement demand. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Ash fusion points Fig. 3 shows the effect of coal content on ash deforming temperature (DT), softening temperature (ST), hemispherical fusion temperature (HT) and flowing temperature (FT). Generally, the addition of coal raised the ash fusion points of the blends. The increase of the fusion points (DT, ST, HT and FT) was prominent when the coal content was between 5 and 10 wt.%. When the coal content was between 15 and 20 wt.%, there were slight decreases in ST, HT and FT. However, the decrease in DT was much sharper. The ST, HT and FT began to increase slowly with coal content when the coal content was greater than 20 wt.%. Again, the trend for DT was different as it did not begin to increase until the coal content was greater than 60 wt.%. The correlations between the fusion points and coal content agreed with the conclusions of study [18] . 3.2 Effect of blend ratio on the ashing process Fig. 4 plots the percentage mass loss rates against temperature during the ashing and ash pyrolysis process in the TGA for samples with coal contents of 0, 10, 40 and 100 wt.%. The figure shows that the straw sample had a high volatile matter release rate in the volatile oxidation reaction stage when the temperature was between 250 and 380 °C. The char firing was completed when the temperature reached 600 °C, and the mass loss rate was reduced to almost zero. There was a much smaller release peak at the stage of straw ash pyrolysis in a temperature range of 900–1050 °C, which contributed to the volatilisation of lower fusion point compounds, such as KCl and K 2 S. Unlike straw, the coal had very little volatile release, and char firing occurred at a higher temperature, which peaked at 600 °C. The mass release rate remained nearly constant throughout the ash pyrolysis stage. For coal, the main mechanism for mass loss during ash pyrolysis was the continuous decomposition of the remainder macromolecule organics, limestone and calcium sulphate, which led to release of CO 2 /SO 3 [19] . There are obvious differences in the behaviours of the mass loss rate between the pure straw sample and the pure coal sample in the TGA. Fig. 4 shows that the mass loss rate curves for the blends with 10 wt.% and 40 wt.% coal are not merely simple combinations of coal and straw. The sample with 10 wt.% showed features similar to straw but with a higher volatile release rate in the oxidation reaction stage. Fig. 5 presents a comparison of the experimentally measured percentage mass loss rate with the theoretical one, which was calculated based on the assumption that mass loss from the blends was simply the summation of proportional contributions from coal and straw in the blends. The mass loss curves for coal and straw in Fig. 4 were used to calculate the theoretical mass loss. Fig. 5 shows that the main difference between the experimentally measured curve and the theoretically predicted curve was the peak volatile release at a temperature range of 250–380 °C. The experimental measured mass loss rate in the volatile release peak was much greater than that of the theoretical one. At a temperature range of 380–1300 °C, there were no obvious differences between the measured and predicted thermal decomposition curves. The results indicated that the total mass in the gaseous products in the sample with 10 wt.% was higher than expected, and, therefore, fewer solid residues remained in the ash. The results from the TGA agreed with the conclusions of the proximate analysis, confirming that there was an ash reduction effect in blends with coal contents ranging from 5 to 20 wt.%. Fig. 6 presents a comparison of the measured and theoretical calculated mass (calculated by Eq. (1) listed in Section 2.1 ) loss curves during the thermal decomposition of a blend with 40 wt.% coal in the TGA. In the low temperature stage, there was reasonable agreement between the measured and theoretically calculated mass loss curves. The volatile release peak was slightly less than expected, and the main difference between the two curves was in a high temperature range from approximately 700 °C to 1300 °C. The experimental measurements indicated that very little thermal decomposition occurred from 700 °C to 1300 °C, and the measured value was much less than the theoretical value. Therefore, these measurements also supported the conclusion of the proximate analysis that there was an ash enhancing effect in the blends with 40 wt.% coal. In summary, the results from the TGA showed that very different mechanisms caused the ash inhibition effect in the blend with 10 wt.% coal and the ash promotion effect in the blend with 40 wt.% coal. This was investigated further with an analysis of the oxides contents and minerals content inside the ashes to examine the interactions between the minerals from straw and coal, during the combustion and pyrolysis processes. 3.3 Ash oxides analysis The morphology of the ashes generated from the proximate analysis tests was analysed using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Fig. 7 shows microscopic images of the ashes from straw, coal, the blend with 10 wt.% coal and the blend with 40 wt.% coal. The straw ash showed a regular fibre bundle shape, and some white fusing mineral particles were visible. The coal ash particles appeared to be regular. The SEM images of the ash from the blend with 10 wt.% coal showed fibre-shaped particles, and there was evidence of local fusion occurring in some ash particles. The evidence indicated that the rapid volatile release and subsequent combustion in the TGA might have caused a rise in the local temperature and could have led to ash particle fusion. No fused particles were found in the microscopic image of the ashes from the blend with 40 wt.% coal. The oxide contents in the ashes of the 11 samples were analysed using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence spectrometry (EDX), and the results are shown in Fig. 8 . The main oxides that were detected included K 2 O, Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , and CaO. Other undetected oxides mainly included S, Cl, P, Na, Mg, and Ti oxides [20,21] . Fig. 8 shows that when a small portion of coal (5–15 wt.%) is added to straw, K 2 O dropped sharply and SiO 2 rose sharply. K 2 O reached its lowest level when coal content was 10 wt.%. SiO 2 content peaked when coal content was 10 wt.% and remained at a high but steady level for the blends with a coal content from 20 to 80 wt.%. Al 2 O 3 content also began to increase when the coal was added and remained at a high level at a coal content ranging from 20 to 80 wt.%. The presence of a high level of SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 supported the conclusions from the measurement of fusion points, which stated that the ash fusion points increased when coal was added to the straw. 3.4 Ash minerals analysis An analysis of minerals in the ashes was also performed using X-ray powder diffractometry, and the results are presented in Table 2 . In the straw ash, the main minerals were Al 2 O 3 , NaCl, SiO 2 , KCl, MgO and CaSO 4 ; the highest content in the straw ash was KCl. KCl was the main reason for the reduction of the ash fusion point and the acceleration of the ash deposits. For the blended fuels, no KCl was detected in the ashes; a small amount of KSi 3 AlO 8 was detected in the ash of the blend with 10 wt.% coal, and the more stable potassium salt K 2 SiO 3 was found in the ash of the blend with 40 wt.% coal. The obvious reduction of K in the ashes indicated that K was converted into gaseous products. For the blend with 10 wt.% coal, only a small amount of K remained in the ashes in the form of the compound KSi 3 AlO 8 . The absence of K 2 SiO 3 in the ash of the blend with 10 wt.% coal indicated that the lowest level of K remained in the ash; therefore, the highest level of K was released into the gaseous products. Therefore, the mechanism for ash reduction in the blend with 10 wt.% coal was the acceleration of K release into the gaseous products due to coupling reactions between the minerals coming from straw and coal. When comparing the minerals found in the coal ashes with the blend of 40 wt.% coal, the major difference was the presence of CaCO 3 , Al 2 O 3 , CaAl 8 Fe 4 O 19 and NaAlSi 3 O 8. It was obvious that CaCO 3 content was greatly reduced in the blend with 40 wt.% coal. In addition, Ca and Al were regrouped to form CaAl 8 Fe 4 O 19 and NaAlSi 3 O 8 , which were not found in the pure coal ashes. This indicated the CaCO 3 had already been transformed into other stable minerals before ash pyrolysis. The thermal decomposition of CaCO 3 was one of the main mechanisms of the continuous gasification during the ash pyrolysis stage for coal. The absence of CaCO 3 indicated that there was no continuous gassifying process in the blend with 40 wt.% coal, which could explain the sudden drop in the TGA mass loss curves of the blend with 40 wt.% coal after reaching a temperature of 700 °C as shown in Fig. 7 . 3.5 Mechanisms of the ash inhibition/promotion effect It can be concluded from the discussion of the TGA mass loss curves and the ash composition analysis that the mechanism for the ash inhibition effect in the blend with 10 wt.% coal was due to the acceleration of K release into the gaseous phase, and the mechanism for ash promotion in the blend with 40 wt.% coal was due to the reformation of Ca and Al into stable minerals. Ash decomposition at high temperatures was greatly reduced, and therefore, more ash residue was produced. The reason for the fast release of K into the gas in the blend with 10 wt.% coal can be explained by the ratio of chlorine to sulphur in the blends. Robson et al. [12] and Aho et al. [13] found that the coupling reactions between minerals were able to release the maximum amount alkali chloride gas (HCl) and reduced ash quantity when the concentration ratio of chlorine to sulphur in the blends was approximately 2:4. The chlorine/sulphur ratio of the blends with 5–15 wt.% coal was estimated to be in this range; however, the chlorine and sulphur contents were not measured in this study. The evidence of local fusion particles in the microscopic images also indicated that local fusion could have caused gasification and led to more gaseous products. The evidence of a very low level of CaCO 3 in the ashes from the proximate analysis on the blend with 40 wt.% coal indicates the presence of interactions between minerals in the coal and straw, which formed new stable compounds and influenced ash pyrolysis at high temperatures. 4 Conclusions (1) The TGA mass loss curves provided a quantitative analysis of the ashing process in both the volatile release and combustion stage in a temperature range of 200–800 °C and in the ash pyrolysis stage in a temperature range of 800–1300 °C. The analysis showed that a high volatile release at a temperature of 250–380 °C caused an ash inhibition effect in the blends ranging from 5 to 15 wt.% coal. The study also revealed that the gasification process at the ash pyrolysis stage was greatly reduced and resulted in greater ash residues in the blends with 40 wt.% coal. (2) A detailed ash analysis was performed to determine the fusion points, the oxide contents and the mineral contents of the samples. The results confirmed that the fast volatile release in the blend with 10 wt.% coal was aided by fast K release into gaseous products. (3) The results of the study of the mineral contents in the ashes indicated that the interactions of the minerals at high temperatures led to the formation of more stable Ca and Al compounds, which halted the decomposition of CaCO 3 and the reduction of gaseous products at high temperatures. Acknowledgements This work was financed by the National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program Grant No. 2008AA05Z311) and the Nature and Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2010EM004). It was also funded by the Shandong Province Colleges and the Universities Outstanding Young Teachers in Visiting Scholars Project. References [1] L. Fryda C. Sobrino C. Cieplik W.L. van de Kamp Study on ash deposition under oxyfuel combustion of coal/biomass blends Fuel 89 2010 1889 1902 [2] B. Sander Properties of Danish biofuels and the requirements for power production Biomass Bioenergy 12 3 1997 177 183 [3] A. Zbogar F. Frandsen P.A. Jensen P. Glarborg Shedding of ash deposits Prog Energy Combust Sci 35 2009 31 56 [4] M. Aho J. Silvennoinen Preventing chlorine deposition on heat transfer surfaces with aluminium–silicon rich biomass residue and additive Fuel 83 2 2004 1299 1305 [5] H.P. Nielsen L.L. Baxter G. Sclippab C. Morey F.J. Frandsen K.D. Johansen Deposition of potassium salts on heat transfer surfaces in straw-fired boilers: a pilot-scale study Fuel 79 2000 131 139 [6] L.L. Baxter Ash deposition during biomass and coal combustion: a mechanistic approach Biomass Bioenergy 4 2 1993 85 102 [7] S. Wang X.M. Jiang X.X. Han H. Wang Fusion characteristic study on seaweed biomass ash Energy Fuels 22 2008 2229 2235 [8] H. Haykiri-Acma S. Yaman Effect of co-combustion on the burn out of lignite/biomass blends: a Turkish case study Waste Manage 28 2008 2077 2084 [9] D. Vamvuka M. Pitharoulis G. Alevizos Ash effects during combustion of lignite/biomass blends in fluidized bed Renew Energy 34 2009 2662 2671 [10] A. Pettersson L.-E. Amand B.-M. Steenari Chemical fractionation for the characterisation of fly ashes from co-combustion of biofuels using different methods for alkali reduction Fuel 88 2009 1758 1772 [11] T. Kupka M. Mancini M. Irmer R. Weber Investigation of ash deposit formation during co-firing of coal with sewage sludge, saw-dust and refuse derived fuel Fuel 87 2008 2824 2837 [12] Robson AL, Junker H, Buckley SG, Sclippa G, Baxter LL. Interactions between coal and biomass when cofiring. In: Twenty-Seventh symposiums (international) on combustion; 1998. p. 1351–59. [13] M. Aho A. Gil R. Taipale P. Vainikka H. Vesal A pilot-scale fireside deposit study of co-firing Cynara with two coals in a fluidised bed Fuel 87 2008 58 69 [14] S.V. Vassilev D. Baxter L.K. Andersen C.G. Vassileva An overview of the chemical composition of biomass Fuel 89 2010 913 933 [15] M. Aho E. Ferrer Importance of coal ash composition in protecting the boiler against chlorine deposition during combustion of chlorine-rich biomass Fuel 84 2005 201 212 [16] D. Vamvuka S. Troulinos E. Kastannaki The effect of mineral matter on the physical and chemical activation of low rank coal and biomass materials Fuel 85 2006 1763 1771 [17] B. Moghtaderi M. Chatphol T. Wall Pyrolytic characteristics of blended coal and woody biomass Fuel 83 2004 745 750 [18] M.J. Fernandez Llorente J.E. Carrasco Garcıa Comparing methods for predicting the sintering of biomass ash in combustion Fuel 84 2005 1893 1900 [19] M. Mueller K.J. Wolf A. Smeda K. Hilpert Release of K, Cl, and S Species during Co-combustion of coal and straw Energy Fuels 20 2006 1444 1449 [20] X.L. Wei U. Schnell R.G. Klaus Behaviour of gaseous chlorine and alkali metals during biomass thermal utilisation Fuel 84 2005 841 848 [21] S. Yani D.K. Zhang An experimental study of sulphate transformation during pyrolysis of an Australian lignite Fuel Process Technol 91 2010 313 321