Abstract:Purpose Previous studies have reported on the outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) versus matrix‐induced ACI (MACI) and microfracture. Specific clinical outcomes of ACI, MACI, osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) have not been well studied. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to analyze the outcomes of these regenerative surgical techniques with an emphasis on comparing their effectiveness using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, the Tegner Activity Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for the surgical treatment of tibiofemoral joint cartilage defects. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies that reported clinical outcomes for ACI, MACI, OAT and OCA procedures. The literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines and only studies involving cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint were included. Outcomes were measured with the IKDC evaluation, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Tegner Activity Scale and the VAS. Outcomes were compared to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). The methodological quality of the included studies was analyzed by the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies and the Jadad scale. Results Forty‐seven studies were included representing a total of 1993 patients with a mean follow‐up time of 57.2 ± 40.3 months (range: 4.0–160.0 months). The location of cartilage defects was reported in 46 studies, with a total of 1922 cartilage defects. There were 1277 medial femoral condyle cartilage defects, 488 lateral femoral condyle cartilage defects, 139 unspecified femoral condyle cartilage defects and 18 tibial plateau cartilage defects. All four procedures reported significant improvements in the Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and VAS scores with no significant differences between them. The OAT technique surpassed the PASS threshold for the IKDC score while all four techniques surpassed the PASS threshold for Tegner and Lysholm scores. Additionally, all procedures met the MCID for each clinical outcome. Conclusion This systematic review and meta‐analysis indicate that ACI, MACI, OAT and OCA all result in significant improvements in knee function and pain for cartilage defects of the tibiofemoral joint. When selecting a procedure, patient and cartilage defect characteristics should be assessed to determine the best technique for each individual patient. Study Design Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Level of Evidence Level III.

A critical review of the literature on arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for acetabular chondral defects

Clinical application and research of autologous chondrocyte implant

Arthroscopic and open approaches for autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis repair of the knee have similar results: a meta-analysis

Outcomes of cartilage repair techniques for chondral injury in the hip-a systematic review

Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Evidence.

A systematic review on Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral knee defects

Editorial Commentary: Osteochodral Autograft and Allograft Show Favorable Outcomes for High-Grade Hip Femoral Cartilage Lesions, but Caution Is Required for Impaction Injuries and Osteonecrosis

Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment

Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation for the Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee

Autologous chondrocyte implantation, matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transplantation and osteochondral allograft improve knee function and pain with considerations for patient and cartilage defects characteristics: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Significant improvements in clinical outcome measures and patient satisfaction after combined all‐arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation: A single‐centre longitudinal study

Autologous bone grafting in combination with autologous chondrocyte implantation yields favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee: A systematic literature review

Open and arthroscopic management of chondral and chondrolabral defects of the hip

Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up

Current surgical options and innovation for repairing articular cartilage defects in the femoral head

Chondrocyte and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis and related orthopaedic conditions

Matrix‐assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation is effective at mid/long‐term for knee lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mid-term results of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for large chondral defects in hips with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

The operative treatment of full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint with autologous chondrocyte transplantation

High Rate of Failure After Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation in Osteoarthritic Knees at 15 Years of Follow-up

Microfractures, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, osteochondral autograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee chondral defects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials