PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Different Tumor Stages and Types of Malignant Salivary Gland Neoplasms: A Single-center Experience
Busra Yaprak Bayrak,Isa Cam,Aziz H Civriz,Esra B Tunce,Bekir C Ozcan,Yigit K Akyol,Hasan M Deger,Cigdem Vural,Murat Ozturk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001209
2024-07-01
Abstract:There is a limited amount of data on the role of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L) -1 and PD-L2 in salivary gland carcinomas. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expressions, which are closely related to immune mechanisms, with respect to salivary gland tumor types and stages. Data from patients with salivary gland masses surgically removed between 2006 and 2021, diagnosed with a malignant salivary gland neoplasm, were retrospectively analyzed. Immunoreactivity for PD-L1 and PD-L2 was performed on resection materials. The mean age of 90 patients was 52.1±18.8 and 46.7% were male. Overall, 55.6% of patients were diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), 23.3% with mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 16.7% with acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC), 3.3% with ductal carcinoma (DC), and 1 patient with pleomorphic adenoma ex carcinoma (PA-ex-CA). In all, 52% of ACC, 12% of AciCC, 24% of MEC, and 12% of DC cases were at stage IV. The tumor diameter, frequencies of lymphovascular invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, and mortality rates of patients at stages III and IV were significantly larger than those at stages I and II ( P <0.05). The percentages of tumor cell score (TCS) and immune cell score (ICS) for PD-L1 were significantly higher among patients with MEC compared with those with other types of tumors ( P =0.0011). However, the percentages of combined score (CS) for PD-L1 and tumor cell score for PD-L2 were comparable among tumor types ( P >0.05). No significant difference was found in these scores for PD-L1 between tumor stages ( P >0.05), but for PD-L2, all patients at stage I had TCS <1% for PD-L2, while all patients at stages II and III, and 92% of patients at stage IV had TCS ≥1% ( P <0.0001). High expression of PD-L1 was mostly observed in MEC cases ( P =0.0016), while all patients with AciCC had a low PD-L1 expression level ( P =0.0206). The mean tumor diameter, rate of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, type of treatment, mortality, and TILs ratio did not differ significantly according to PD-L1 expression level ( P >0.05). The percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was comparable among negative and positive PD-L1 scores according to both 1% and 5% threshold values ( P >0.05). High PD-L1 expression is rare in AciCC, while PD-L1 expression is high in MEC. Our findings underline the importance of future screening for PD-L1 and PD-L2 before patients undergoing immunotherapies in all salivary gland tumors.