The advantages and challenges of neurodiversity employment in organizations

Anna Krzeminska,Robert D. Austin,Susanne M. Bruyère,Darren Hedley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.58

2019-07-01

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1833367219000580/resource/name/firstPage-S1833367219000580a.jpg

management

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Neurodiversity in the healthcare profession

Jo-Anne Johnson,Sanjiv Ahluwalia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae108

2024-08-30

Abstract:The term neurodiversity was coined in the 1990s to describe a diversity in thinking, learning, and processing the world around us, and is associated with strengths as well as challenges. Rates of diagnosis of neurodivergent conditions are rising rapidly amongst patients and healthcare professionals, largely due to a recent surge in awareness and understanding of neurodiverse conditions and more inclusive diagnostic criteria. Societal adaptation, however, has lagged, and likely explains some of the psychosocial comorbidities of neurodiversity, as individuals are forced to adapt their personality and how they display their emotions to fit societal norms. There remains a lack of awareness and understanding of neurodiversity amongst the healthcare professions. There is also very limited published literature on the challenges and strengths of this group in the clinical environment. Here, we use a case study, focusing on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to explore the relationship between neurodiversity and work from the perspective of a neurodiverse health care professional. We challenge the notion that neurodiversity itself is a disability, but more likely a result of lack of societal awareness and adaption. We suggest accommodations and training in the clinical environment to raise awareness and support neurodiverse healthcare professionals in order that they flourish rather than struggle in the workplace.
Neurodiversity in the workplace: Considering neuroatypicality as a form of diversity

Carter,Nathan T.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.86

2023-03-10

Cambridge Prisms: Plastics

Abstract:Estimates suggest as much as 17% of the US workforce may be neuroatypical, a term used to describe individuals whose neurological functioning is at the tail ends of the distribution of naturally occurring variation. Although the neuroatypical population has a history of under- and unemployment, their inclusion in the modern workplace (i.e., promotion of neurodiversity within organizations) is gaining recognition by scholars and organizations as an important dimension of organizational diversity. Despite this burgeoning interest in examining neuroatypicality in the context of organizational diversity, surprisingly little research has been conducted that bridges these two research areas. The literature that does exist is scattered across several different academic disciplines, largely outside of industrial-organizational psychology, and rarely examines the employment of neuroatypical workers explicitly from a diversity perspective. In this article we argue that as the nature of work evolves and jobs continue to become more specialized, neurodiversity will become an increasingly relevant dimension of organizational diversity and is likely to play a key role both in terms of individual employees' well-being and performance outcomes, as well as organizational success.
Neurodiversity at work: a biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults

Nancy Doyle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021

2020-09-01

British Medical Bulletin

Abstract:Abstract Introduction The term neurodiversity is defined and discussed from the perspectives of neuroscience, psychology and campaigners with lived experience, illustrating the development of aetiological theories for included neurodevelopmental disorders. The emerging discourse is discussed with relevance to adults, social inclusion, occupational performance and the legislative obligations of organizations. Sources of data Literature is reviewed from medicine, psychiatry, psychology, sociology and popular press. No new data are presented in this article. Areas of agreement There is consensus regarding some neurodevelopmental conditions being classed as neurominorities, with a ‘spiky profile’ of executive functions difficulties juxtaposed against neurocognitive strengths as a defining characteristic. Areas of controversy The developing nomenclature is debated and the application of disability status versus naturally occurring difference. Diagnosis and legal protections vary geographically, resulting in heretofore unclear guidance for practitioners and employers. Growing points The evolutionary critique of the medical model, recognizing and updating clinical approaches considering the emerging consensus and paradigmatic shift. Areas timely for developing research It is recommended that research addresses more functional, occupational concerns and includes the experiences of stakeholders in research development, moving away from diagnosis and deficit towards multi-disciplinary collaboration within a biopsychosocial model.

medicine, general & internal
Managing Neurodiversity in Workplaces: A Review and Future Research Agenda for Sustainable Human Resource Management

Ewa Rollnik-Sadowska,Violetta Grabińska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156594

IF: 3.9

2024-08-02

Sustainability

Abstract:This review article explores the scientific literature on managing neurodiversity in workplaces, aiming to identify emerging research directions, gaps, and methods used. A systematic literature review in the hybrid form was implemented, combining bibliometric analysis and structured review. A review of selected social sciences publications from the SCOPUS database was conducted. The literature review reveals a lack of research linking neurodiversity with human capital management. Key findings indicate that neurodivergent individuals contribute unique talents contingent on appropriate management strategies. The research identified in the reviewed literature in the scope of managing neurodiversity in workplaces primarily focuses on four areas: the well-being of individuals with autism, inclusion strategies, employment challenges, and recruitment transformations. The review identified 22 articles addressing the following areas: mental health and quality of life, inclusive workplace designs, psychological perspectives, and human resource practice adaptations. Additional studies cover family relationships, emotional intelligence, and the need for new research approaches, predominantly using qualitative methods. The study concludes that more theories, methods, and contexts are needed to support neurodivergent employees. Future research should develop integrated solutions to enhance employment rates and reduce turnover, using theories like Self-Determination Theory and Universally Designed Synergistic Supervision. Integrating neurodiversity into sustainable human resource management practices can enhance innovation, employee satisfaction, and organizational reputation. Continuous policy improvement is crucial for long-term success and inclusivity.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Building a Neurodiverse High-tech Workforce.

Eleanor T. Loiacono,Huimin Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00001

IF: 6.353

2018-01-01

MIS Quarterly Executive

Abstract:Worldwide, a growing proportion of the population has some sort of neurodiverse condition, such as autism and ADHD. However, such people have skills and perspectives that can be valuable for high-tech companies whose success depends on "out-of-the-box" thinking. We describe the experiences of two major high-tech firms (one U.S.-based and the other European) in building a neurodiverse workforce.(2,3)
Digitalization and inclusiveness of HRM practices: The example of neurodiversity initiatives

Emmanuelle Walkowiak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12499

IF: 5.667

2023-02-21

Human Resource Management Journal

Abstract:The transformation of the intelligence ecosystem associated with the digital transformation represents a critical juncture for diversity and inclusion (D&I). We present a multidisciplinary perspective on digital transformation and D&I that demonstrates that, in the context of automated decision making, where algorithmic biases and the standardisation of thought represent new risks, neurodiversity initiatives become a cornerstone for advancing D&I. Based on interviews with neurodiversity experts, we identify innovative ways to efficiently configure an inclusive organisational design targeting neurodiversity by leveraging technologies. We identify several properties of technologies that support D&I in neurodiversity initiatives: the neutralisation of biases during interviews, the development of digital support for physical and mental well‐being and the facilitation of different cognition modes. Finally, we critically discuss the risks and opportunities offered by various technologies in terms of performance evaluation, new forms of dominance, and design of a digital ecosystem for mental well‐being.

management,industrial relations & labor
Science needs neurodiversity

H. Holden Thorp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq0060

IF: 56.9

2024-04-27

Science

Abstract:All brains work differently. Individuals process information and engage with the world in ways that are influenced by a multitude of biological, cultural, and social factors. In the world of science, these differences are what spark innovation. This is why the scientific community needs to better recognize the enormous potential of neurodiversity and bear in mind that certain behavioral and cognitive traits that may strike some as unusual can be catalytic to the scientific quest.

multidisciplinary sciences
Organizational benefits of neurodiversity: Preliminary findings on autism and the bystander effect

Lorne M Hartman,Mehrdad Farahani,Alexander Moore,Ateeya Manzoor,Braxton L Hartman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3012

Abstract:Although the bystander effect is one of the most important findings in the psychological literature, researchers have not explored whether autistic individuals are prone to the bystander effect. The present research examines whether autistic employees are more likely to report issues or concerns in an organization's systems and practices that are inefficient or dysfunctional. By bringing attention to these issues, autistic employees may foster opportunities to improve organizational performance, leading to the development of a more adaptive, high performing, and ethical culture. Thirty-three autistic employees and 34 nonautistic employees completed an online survey to determine whether employees on the autism spectrum (1) are more likely to report they would voice concerns about organizational dysfunctions, (2) are less likely to report they were influenced by the number of other witnesses to the dysfunction, (3) if they do not voice concerns, are more likely to acknowledge the influence of other people on the decision, (4) are less likely to formulate "elaborate rationales" for their decisions to intervene or not, and (5) whether any differences between autistic and nonautistic employees with regards to the first two hypotheses, intervention likelihood and degree of influence, are moderated by individual differences in camouflaging. Results indicate that autistic employees may be less susceptible to the bystander effect than nonautistic employees. As a result, autistic employees may contribute to improvements in organizational performance because they are more likely to identify and report inefficient processes and dysfunctional practices when they witness them. These preliminary findings suggesting potential benefits of neurodiversity in the workplace are promising. However, further research is required.
Autism and neurodiversity: a new paradigm

Sue Fletcher-Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-bnpa.5

2023-11-15

Abstract:Sue Fletcher-Watson holds a Personal Chair in Developmental Psychology at the University of Edinburgh, and is Director of the Salvesen Mindroom Research Centre. She is interested in how children grow and learn, with a particular focus on development, neurodiversity and autism across the lifespan. Her work draws on rigorous methods from psychology and applies these to questions with clinical, educational and societal impact. She strives to achieve meaningful partnerships with community representatives and to support neurodivergent leadership in research. She is an advocate for open science and good citizenship in research, and serves as Co-Director of Research Ethics for the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. Abstract Neurodiversity is a simple, incontrovertible scientific fact, and yet the implications of this concept are both profound and radical. In this talk I will briefly examine how we have attempted to define, diagnose and support autistic people to date, showing the failings of these approaches. I will then go on to define neurodiversity and three core tenets of the neurodiversity paradigm. I will directly address some of the myths around neurodiversity, drawing on the work of prominent neurodivergent scholars to provide a solid basis for understanding. In the second half of the talk, I will then explore the potential of a neurodiversity paradigm to improve how we identify and provide support to autistic people. I will work through the implications of neurodiversity for clinical diagnostic and therapeutic practice, including a specific rebuttal of concerns that the neurodiversity movement is aligned with an anti-psychiatry position. I will ask: what would neurodiversity-affirmative services look like? And why and how should we create them?

surgery,psychiatry,clinical neurology
The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?

Patrick Dwyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000523723

2022-02-22

Human Development

Abstract:This paper presents the concepts of “neurodiversity” and the “neurodiversity approaches” towards disability. This paper discusses how confusion regarding the meaning of these concepts exacerbates debate and conflict surrounding the neurodiversity approaches. For example, some claim the neurodiversity approaches focus solely on society and denies contributions of individual characteristics to disability (a controversial stance), whereas this paper joins other literature in acknowledging the contributions of both individual and society to disability. This paper also addresses other controversies related to neurodiversity, such as uncertainty regarding the scope of the approaches – to whom do they apply? – and their implications for diagnostic categories. Finally, this paper provides recommendations for developmental researchers who wish to carry out neurodiversity-aligned research: scholars are urged to study both individual neurodivergent people and the contexts around them; to consider both strengths and weaknesses; to recognize their own biases; and to listen to and learn from neurodivergent people.

psychology, developmental
Neurodiversity in the Minds of Students: From Perception to Campus Programming

Brooke V Castleman,Lamis Z Jarvinen,Michael K Jarvinen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59390/QCWZ6366

2024-08-31

Abstract:Neurodiversity is a social justice movement at the nexus of neuroscience, academia, and public policy. A contemporary view of neurodiversity is one that embraces neurological differences, encompassing all "neurotypes," including more specific identifiers like autistic or dyslexic. The goal of this study was to investigate student awareness and perception of neurodiversity since they are the next generation of public policy makers. Students enrolled in Introduction to Behavioral Neuroscience (N=146) were exposed to different information sources (popular, academic, TED talk, or choose/find their own) on the topic of neurodiversity. They then wrote a paper where they summarized: a) the information source used, b) their ideas to better support a neurodiverse society, and c) their opinions on aspects of neurodiversity. Several important findings emerged. First, 64% of the sample had never heard of the term neurodiversity; this class was their first exposure to it. Second, students conducting their own searches on neurodiversity had the highest level of optimism (p < 0.05) that society was ready to accept neurodiversity. Students identified even higher rates of receptivity (85%) amongst their friends. Third, student ideas to advance neurodiversity were organized into more salient categories for campuses to consider. Our findings challenge neuroscience programs to consider their role in providing "first exposure" opportunities to students in the diversity, equity, and inclusion realm, especially in areas directly related to our field. We also discuss the growing relevance of neurodiversity in research and academia and offer programming possibilities to enhance neurodiversity awareness and support on college campuses.
Neurodiversity in Promoting the Well-Being of Children on the Autism Spectrum

Amy K. Izuno-Garcia,Morgan M. McNeel,Rachel H. Fein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2022.2126436

2023-02-10

Child Care in Practice

Abstract:Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by differences in social communication and the presence of restricted and repetitive patterns of behaviors and interests [American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ]. The prevalence rate of autism has increased in recent years, now occurring in 1 in 44 children in the United States [Maenner et al. (2021). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years – Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2018. Surveillance Summaries , 70 (11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7011a1 ]. As more children are identified as autistic, more healthcare and educational professionals are involved in the care of these unique individuals. Understanding the challenges, as well as the strengths, of individuals on the autism spectrum is paramount to promoting the well-being of these children. One framework that aids in better understanding and supporting autistic individuals is the neurodiversity paradigm. The purpose of this practitioner review is to: (1) provide a broad overview of the tenets of the neurodiversity paradigm and (2) provide recommendations for neurodiversity affirming service provision.
Challenges, Strengths, and Strategies of Software Engineers with ADHD: A Case Study

Grischa Liebel,Noah Langlois,Kiev Gama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.05029

2023-12-08

Software Engineering

Abstract:Neurodiversity describes brain function variation in individuals, including Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Autism spectrum disorder. Neurodivergent individuals both experience challenges and exhibit strengths in the workplace. As an important disorder included under the neurodiversity term, an estimated 5.0% to 7.1% of the world population have ADHD. However, existing studies involving ADHD in the workplace are of general nature and do not focus on software engineering (SE) activities. To address this gap, we performed an exploratory qualitative case study on the experiences of people with ADHD working in SE. We find that people with ADHD struggle with several important SE-related activities, e.g., task organisation and estimation, attention to work, relation to others. Furthermore, they experience issues with physical and mental health. In terms of strengths, they exhibit, e.g., increased creative skills, perform well when solving puzzles, and have the capability to think ahead. Our findings align well with existing clinical ADHD research, and have important implications to SE practice.
Diversity, epistemic injustice and medicalization

Christophe Gauld,Lucie Jurek,Pierre Fourneret

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.03.003

IF: 4.644

Cortex

Abstract:This Viewpoint explores challenges within the neurodiversity framework, with a particular focus on autism, and discusses three critical aspects: the risk of epistemic injustice, the balance between over and undermedicalization, and the terminological complexities associated with the "neuro-" prefix. It underscores the importance of a balanced approach that avoids overmedicalization while providing essential support, addresses concerns about the indiscriminate use of "neurodiverse", questions the terminology on neurodiversity, and suggests considering a broader term like "biopsychosocial diversity". Ultimately, this Viewpoint advocates for a measured approach to neurodiversity, emphasizing historical context and a diverse perspective to foster collaboration between cognitive science and behavior research.
Neurodiversity Approaches and Autism (ASD): A Scoping Review

Ravindra Kumar Kushwaha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i2.612

2023-12-01

Abstract:Neurodiversity is a movement that wants to make us think differently about autism. It disagrees with the idea that autism is a disease and instead sees it as a neurological difference: a person who thinks and feels the world in a different way. This article talks about the ideas behind the neurodiversity approaches to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as well as the conflicts that have come up around these approaches. For example, some people say that neurodiversity approaches only look at society and don't consider the role of individual traits in ASD. This study agrees with other research that both individual and social factors play a role in ASD. This article will be mostly about how to deal with neurodiversity. But even this use of "neurodiversity" is hard for ASD to define.
The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation

Rachel K Schuck,Sunghee Choi,Kaitlynn MP Baiden,Patrick Dwyer,Mirko Uljarević

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241245756

2024-05-01

Autism

Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. Neurodiversity refers to the idea that all brains—no matter their differences—are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people, from effects on daily interactions to how professionals deliver services for neurodivergent individuals. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially intervene to improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development and initial validation of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ), including item revision based on expert review, cognitive interviews, systematic evaluation of participants' response process, and analysis of the instrument's internal factor structure using exploratory structural equation modeling. Pilot analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working in or intending to pursue helping professions indicates that the NDAQ has construct validity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective, further validation work is still needed.Lay Neurodiversity refers to the idea that brain differences (including disabilities) are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward neurodiversity can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people (those whose brains do not fit society's "standard"). These impacts can include effects on daily interactions, as well as how professionals such as teachers and doctors deliver services to neurodivergent people. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). NDAQ development included revision of questionnaire items based on feedback from experts and neurodivergent people, systematically evaluating the way participants responded to questionnaire items, and analysis of how the NDAQ items are grouped into different factors. A preliminary analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working or planning to work in a helping profession (e.g. doctors, teachers, therapists, and so on) indicates that the NDAQ measures attitudes toward neurodiversity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the broad idea of neurodiversity, further work is still needed.

psychology, developmental
An exploration into the prevalence and experience of neurodiversity among staff at a UK high‐secure psychiatric hospital

Freya Walker,Anna Samya Sri,David Murphy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2360

2024-11-03

Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health

Abstract:Background Whilst there is increasing recognition and interest in how staff who have neurodivergence are represented and contribute to industry, to date, there has been very little exploration of neurodivergence among healthcare staff and none with those working in forensic psychiatric services. Aims To estimate the prevalence of neurodivergence among staff working in a UK high‐secure psychiatric hospital and explore their experiences. Methods All staff were invited to complete a confidential online self‐report questionnaire consisting of both closed and open questions. Results A fifth of the staff responded (n = 124), but two did not report their neurodivergent status, so were excluded. Nearly 40% of responders reported having some form of neurodivergence, with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) being the most common, followed by dyslexia, autism and dyspraxia. Over a third (36%) of those reporting neurodivergence said that they had chosen not to disclose this to the organisation and around a quarter (23%) reported not feeling valued or supported by the organisation. Of the staff cohort who responded, most expressed the view that neurodiversity in the workforce is beneficial to patient care, despite the majority being unsure whether neurodivergence is an advantage or a barrier for the individual themselves. Over half of staff completing the survey felt there was not enough awareness of neurodiversity among staff and that more training on the subject would be beneficial. Conclusion This survey suggests gaps in our recognition and understanding of neurodivergence among hospital staff. Although the prevalence figure should be treated with caution, given the low response rate, in this first survey of neurodivergence among staff in a secure hospital, our findings suggest substantial numbers of staff with neurodivergence and the likelihood that neither they nor the organisation are optimising this situation. The further steps should include the development and evaluation of strategies exploring ways of improving recognition and relevant support for staff, as well as discovering ways in which neurodivergence in staff might inform and optimise care and treatment for patients.

psychiatry,criminology & penology
Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees

Joanna Maria Szulc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.26

2024-09-05

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1754942624000269/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S1754942624000269a.jpg

psychology, applied
Five interdisciplinary tensions and opportunities in neurodiversity research

Olujolagbe Layinka,Luca D Hargitai,Punit Shah,Lucy H Waldren,Florence YN Leung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.98461

IF: 7.7

2024-04-24

eLife

Abstract:Improving our understanding of autism, ADHD, dyslexia and other neurodevelopmental conditions requires collaborations between genetics, psychiatry, the social sciences and other fields of research.

biology
Applied human neuroscience: Fostering and designing inclusive environments with the 3E‐Cognition perspective

Francisco J. Parada,Aitana Grasso‐Cladera,Alejandra Rossi,Patricia Soto‐Icaza,Maritza Arenas‐Pérez,María Constanza Errázuriz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16463

IF: 3.698

2024-07-14

European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract:In this article, we discuss the embodied, environmentally scaffolded, and enactive perspective for the understanding of cognition (3E‐Cognition, yellow, centre) and its many applications related to neurodiversity (bottom left, red circles). Among the many applications possible, this article focuses on education (top left), workspace (bottom left), and healthcare (bottom right). The article also discusses the role of neuroscience research and the mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) framework to advance our understanding of neurodiversity (top right blue circle). The conventional medical paradigm often focuses on deficits and impairments, failing to capture the rich tapestry of experiences and abilities inherent in neurodiversity conditions. In this article, we introduce the 3E‐Cognition perspective, offering a paradigm shift by emphasizing the dynamic interplay between the brain, body, and environment in shaping cognitive processes. The perspective fosters a more inclusive and supportive understanding of neurodiversity, with potential applications across various domains such as education, workplace, and healthcare. We begin by introducing the 3E‐Cognition principles: embodied, environmentally scaffolded, and enactive. Then, we explore how the 3E‐Cognition perspective can be applied to create inclusive environments and experiences for neurodiverse individuals. We provide examples in the realms of education, workplace, and healthcare. In all of these domains, spaces, methodologies, epistemologies, and roles that cater to diverse needs and strengths can be designed using the 3E principles. Finally, we discuss the challenges and benefits of implementing the 3E‐Cognition perspective. We focus on the need for technological advancements and research in complex real‐world scenarios; we suggest mobile brain/body imaging is a possible solution. We furthermore highlight the importance of recognizing and valuing the diverse manners of experiencing and interacting with the world, the promotion of diverse well‐being, and the facilitation of innovation and creativity. Thus, we conclude that the 3E‐Cognition perspective offers a groundbreaking approach to understanding and supporting neurodiversity: by embracing the inherent interconnectedness of the brain, body, and environment, we can create a more inclusive and supportive world.

neurosciences

The advantages and challenges of neurodiversity employment in organizations

Neurodiversity in the healthcare profession

Neurodiversity in the workplace: Considering neuroatypicality as a form of diversity

Neurodiversity at work: a biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults

Managing Neurodiversity in Workplaces: A Review and Future Research Agenda for Sustainable Human Resource Management

Building a Neurodiverse High-tech Workforce.

Digitalization and inclusiveness of HRM practices: The example of neurodiversity initiatives

Science needs neurodiversity

Organizational benefits of neurodiversity: Preliminary findings on autism and the bystander effect

Autism and neurodiversity: a new paradigm

The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?

Neurodiversity in the Minds of Students: From Perception to Campus Programming

Neurodiversity in Promoting the Well-Being of Children on the Autism Spectrum

Challenges, Strengths, and Strategies of Software Engineers with ADHD: A Case Study

Diversity, epistemic injustice and medicalization

Neurodiversity Approaches and Autism (ASD): A Scoping Review

The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation

An exploration into the prevalence and experience of neurodiversity among staff at a UK high‐secure psychiatric hospital

Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees

Five interdisciplinary tensions and opportunities in neurodiversity research

Applied human neuroscience: Fostering and designing inclusive environments with the 3E‐Cognition perspective