Abstract:This manuscript undertakes a disciplinary self-critique of the field of implementation science, a field which attempts to bridge the gap between evidence-based interventions and their practical application. Despite the heightened emphasis on health equity and racial disparities, the field's current discourse is limited by key epistemic shortcomings. First, even though prevalence of implementation gaps between racialized groups in the United States necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the systems perpetuating these disparities, the field does not operate with a general explanation for disparities not as a failure of systems, but a system historically and structural designed to produce disparities. Second, the field has attempted to address disparities without adequate dialog with a broad tradition of anti-racist and anti-colonial sociology, history and epistemology, and therefore risks a decontextualized analysis of disparities and under-informed approaches to achieving equity. Fortunately, scholarship from the Black radical tradition (BRT), such as the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP), Critical Race Theory (CRT), and more broadly conceptual frameworks from post-modern, anti-colonial, Black feminist studies and social epistemology can offer to implementation science frameworks that center power dynamics and racialized oppression. This epistemic re-alignment of implementation research to "center at the margins" can enable the field of implementation science to more critically examine and dismantle systems that perpetuate racial inequalities in access to and utilization of health interventions. For example, normalization and dynamic fit, which are thought to be key mechanisms of implementation, are revealed in the light of this tradition of scholarship to be potentially problematic acquiescence to oppressive systems. Drawing from the concept of resistance anchored in the scholarship of the Black radical tradition as well as contemporary social epistemology such as the work of José Medina and Maria Fricker about epistemic justice, the authors further advance that implementation science could make more substantial contributions to the dismantling of racialized systems and actively work toward health justice through the transdisciplinary lens of resistance. This is a call to action for integrating implementation science with critical philosophical and theoretical perspectives rooted in Black studies and related insights, which have been acquired through the struggle for social justice, to inform the design of implementation strategies and research projects that improve health services and health outcomes for health disparity populations.

Implementation Science and Human Service Organizations Research: Opportunities and Challenges for Building on Complementary Strengths

Commentary: Bridging and Reducing the Gaps Between Research and Practice: Pathways to Outcomes and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation 2.0

Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems

Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design

Integrating Social Needs into Health Care: An Implementation Science Perspective

Quality improvement and implementation science in cancer care: Identifying areas of synergy and opportunities for further integration.

Linking dissemination and implementation science to Learning Health Systems: Opportunities for Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions

Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem

Implementation science in humanitarian assistance: applying a novel approach for humanitarian care optimization

Leveraging systems science and design thinking to advance implementation science: moving toward a solution-oriented paradigm

Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer Care: Identifying Areas of Synergy and Opportunities for Further Integration

Building organizational and strategic interprofessional collaboration and partnerships: a case study

Research and Practice in Quality Improvement and Implementation Science: The Synergy for Change Model

Applying Implementation Science to Advance Electronic Health Record–Driven Learning Health Systems: Case Studies, Challenges, and Recommendations

The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science

Gaps in communication theory paradigms when conducting implementation science research: qualitative observations from interviews with administrators, implementors, and evaluators of rural health programs

Leveraging Implementation Science to Advance Environmental Justice Research and Achieve Health Equity through Neighborhood and Policy Interventions

Situating implementation science (IS) in res(IS)tance: a conceptual frame toward the integration of scholarship from the black radical tradition

Challenges and Opportunities for Paving the Road to Global Health Equity Through Implementation Science

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity