Abstract:Efforts to improve cancer care primarily come from two fields: improvement science and implementation science. The two fields have developed independently, yet they have potential for synergy. Leveraging that synergy to enhance alignment could both reduce duplication and, more importantly, enhance the potential of both fields to improve care. To better understand potential for alignment, we examined 20 highly cited cancer-related improvement science and implementation science studies published in the past 5 years, characterizing and comparing their objectives, methods, and approaches to practice change. We categorized studies as improvement science or implementation science based on authors’ descriptions when possible; otherwise, we categorized studies as improvement science if they evaluated efforts to improve the quality, value, or safety of care, or implementation science if they evaluated efforts to promote the implementation of evidence-based interventions into practice. All implementation studies (10/10) and most improvement science studies (6/10) sought to improve uptake of evidence-based interventions. Improvement science and implementation science studies employed similar approaches to change practice. For example, training was employed in 8/10 implementation science studies and 4/10 improvement science studies. However, improvement science and implementation science studies used different terminology to describe similar concepts and emphasized different methodological aspects in reporting. Only 4/20 studies (2 from each category) described using a formal theory or conceptual framework to guide program development. Most studies were multi-site (10/10 implementation science and 6/10 improvement science) and a minority (2 from each category) used a randomized design. Based on our review, cancer-related improvement science and implementation science studies use different terminology and emphasize different methodological aspects in reporting but share similarities in purpose, scope, and methods, and are at similar levels of scientific development. The fields are well-positioned for alignment. We propose that next steps include harmonizing language and cross-fertilizing methods of program development and evaluation.

Research and Practice in Quality Improvement and Implementation Science: The Synergy for Change Model

Nursing Leader Collaboration to Drive Quality Improvement and Implementation Science

Quality improvement and implementation science in cancer care: Identifying areas of synergy and opportunities for further integration.

What Is Implementation Science and What Forces Are Driving a Change in Medical Education?

The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science

Quality Improvement Methods in Clinical Medicine

Publication of quality improvement in medical oncology: A descriptive numerical summary from a scoping review.

Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis

Complexity, co-creation and social practices : re-constructing quality improvement : a case study in mental health

Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer Care: Identifying Areas of Synergy and Opportunities for Further Integration

Using Implementation Science to Implement Evidence‐Based Practice: A Discursive Paper

An Integrative Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Nurse Engagement in Quality Improvement in the Clinical Practice Setting

Transforming health care from the inside out: advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century

Does quality improvement improve quality?

Data to knowledge to improvement: creating the learning health system

Integrating Implementation Science in a Quality and Patient Safety Improvement Learning Collaborative: Essential Ingredients and Impact

Commentary: Bridging and Reducing the Gaps Between Research and Practice: Pathways to Outcomes and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation 2.0

Describing a programme of implementation‐effectiveness research on the organization and implementation of frontline nursing care delivery into diverse heath systems

An interprofessional postgraduate quality improvement curriculum: results and lessons learned over a 5-year implementation

A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review