Combined pulsed and thermal radiofrequency versus thermal radiofrequency alone in the treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression: A double blinded comparative study

Khaled A. Abdel‐Rahman,Abdelraheem M. Elawamy,Mohamed F. Mostafa,Waleed S. Hasan,Ragaa Herdan,Nagwa M. Osman,Abdelrady S. Ibrahim,Mohamed G. Aly,Abdelhady S. Ali,Gamal M. Abodahab
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1489
2019-10-16
European Journal of Pain
Abstract:BackgroundRecurrent trigeminal neuralgia (RTN) is a common clinical problem and pain recurs in many patients after microvascular decompression (MVD). We evaluated the effect of adding pulsed radiofrequency to radiofrequency thermocoagulation at 60 ºC compared to radiofrequency thermocoagulation at 70 ºC alone in the treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression. Methods40 patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression were randomly divided to two equal groups. Group A: received prolonged duration of pulsed radiofrequency followed by less destructive thermocoagulation, while group B: received sole thermocoagulation. Then patients followed up for 2 years to evaluate the success rate by the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity (BNI) Scale, complications, and the need to medical treatment. ResultsThe success rate was 100% in both groups at discharge (BNI0.05). In group A 88.9% of patients stopped tegretol treatment after the procedure compared to 84.2% in group B (p=0.32). 88.9% compared to 89.5% % in group A and B, respectively did not use tricyclic antidepressant (p =0.61). The overall complications in group A was 5.61%, while it was 36.8% in group B (p= 0.025). ConclusionCombined pulsed and thermal radiofrequency can significantly reduce the incidence of the side effects/complications with similar success rate than using thermal radiofrequency alone in treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression.
neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?