Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

Beyond Uncertainty Aversion

Robust Utility Maximization with Extremely Ambiguity-Loving and Ambiguity-Aversion Preferences

Aversion to ambiguity and model misspecification in dynamic stochastic environments

Dynamically Consistent α-Maxmin Expected Utility

A Rank-Dependent Theory for Decision under Risk and Ambiguity

Ambiguity, randomization and the timing of resolution of uncertainty

Ambiguity aversion, risk aversion, and the weight of evidence

AMBIGUOUS RISK AVERSION UNDER CAPACITY

Ambiguity Attitudes over Time

Robust Portfolio Choice under the Modified Constant Elasticity of Variance

Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time

Risk Aversion in the Nash Bargaining Problem with Uncertainty

Is Ambiguity Aversion a Preference? Ambiguity Aversion without Asymmetric Information

Uncertain Expected Utility Function and Its Risk Premium

A Review of Ambiguity Aversion in Behavioral Decision Making

The Formation Mechanism of Ambiguity Aversion:A Perspective Based on the Evaluability Hypothesis

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

A Shrinkage Approach to Model Uncertainty and Asset Allocation

Robust Consumption And Portfolio Choices With Habit Formation

A Model-Free Continuum of Degrees of Risk Aversion

Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion