Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess whether educated non-researcher audiences understand how to reuse research data stored in a data repository. Design/methodology/approach A total of 44 participants in two user studies were asked to study a data set accessed from re3data.org. The participants were non-researcher audiences of the disciplines of the selected data sets. They were asked to figure out whether they understood how to reuse a data set after reading all the metadata or contextual information about the data set. Findings Most participants reported that they figured out how to reuse the data, although their self-reports can be an overestimated assessment. However, the participants understand how to reuse a data set either numerically or statistically significantly worse than what the data set is, how it was collected or created and its purpose. Data set type tends to play a role in understanding how to reuse data sets and the purpose of data sets. Participants reported that unless a data set is self-explanatory, instructions on data set reuse and the purpose of data set were necessary for understanding how to reuse data set. However, because data reuse requires domain knowledge and data processing skills, some non-researcher audiences who lack domain knowledge and data processing skills may not understand how to reuse the data set in any way. Research limitations/implications This study’s findings enrich the theoretical framework of data sharing and reuse by expanding the necessary information to be included in data documentation to support non-researchers’ data reuse. The findings of the study complement previous literature. Practical implications This study extended previous literature by suggesting detailed data reuse instructions be included in data documentation if data producers and data curators wish to support educated non-researchers’ data reuse. This study’s findings enable policymakers of research data management (RDM) to formulate guidelines for supporting non-researchers’ data reuse. If data curators need to work with data producers to prepare the instructions on data reuse for non-researcher audiences, they probably need computing and data processing skills. This has implications for Library and Information Science schools to educate data librarians. Originality/value The research question is original because non-researcher audiences in the context of RDM have not been studied before. This study extended previous literature by suggesting detailed data reuse instructions be included in data documentation if data curators and data producers and data curators wish to support educated non-researchers’ data reuse. This study’s findings enable policymakers of RDM to formulate guidelines for supporting non-researchers’ data reuse.

Scientists' data discovery and reuse behavior: (Meta)data fitness for use and the FAIR data principles

Lost or found? Discovering data needed for research

Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage

The Landscape of Data Reuse in Interactive Information Retrieval: Motivations, Sources, and Evaluation of Reusability

Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data

Talking datasets: Understanding data sensemaking behaviours

Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide

Data Sustainability and Reuse Pathways of Natural Resources and Environmental Scientists

Reuse‐oriented Data Publishing: How to Make the Shared Research Data Friendlier for Researchers

An Assessment of Whether Educated Non-Researcher Audiences Understand How to Reuse Research Data

Make scientific data FAIR

Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared

Daily life in the Open Biologist's second job, as a Data Curator

Modeling Users' Data Usage Experiences From Scientific Literature

Reusing Data Technical and Ethical Challenges

Data sharing and reuse practices: disciplinary differences and improvements needed

From Data Creator to Data Reuser: Distance Matters

Searching Data: A Review of Observational Data Retrieval Practices in Selected Disciplines

Enabling FAIR Research in Earth Science through Research Objects

Applying FAIRness: Redesigning a Biomedical Informatics Research Data Management Pipeline

Who Re-Uses Data? A Bibliometric Analysis of Dataset Citations