Abstract:In this review, current EU GMO regulations are subjected to a point-by point analysis to determine their suitability for agriculture in modern Europe. Our analysis concerns present GMO regulations as well as suggestions for possible new regulations for genome editing and New Breeding Techniques (for which no regulations presently exist). Firstly, the present GMO regulations stem from the early days of recombinant DNA and are not adapted to current scientific understanding on this subject. Scientific understanding of GMOs has changed and these regulations are now, not only unfit for their original purpose, but, the purpose itself is now no longer scientifically valid. Indeed, they defy scientific, economic, and even common, sense. A major EU regulatory preconception is that GM crops are basically different from their parent crops. Thus, the EU regulations are "process based" regulations that discriminate against GMOs simply because they are GMOs. However current scientific evidence shows a blending of classical crops and their GMO counterparts with no clear demarcation line between them. Canada has a "product based" approach and determines the safety of each new crop variety independently of the process used to obtain it. We advise that the EC re-writes it outdated regulations and moves toward such a product based approach. Secondly, over the last few years new genomic editing techniques (sometimes called New Breeding Techniques) have evolved. These techniques are basically mutagenesis techniques that can generate genomic diversity and have vast potential for crop improvement. They are not GMO based techniques (any more than mutagenesis is a GMO technique), since in many cases no new DNA is introduced. Thus they cannot simply be lumped together with GMOs (as many anti-GMO NGOs would prefer). The EU currently has no regulations to cover these new techniques. In this review, we make suggestions as to how these new gene edited crops may be regulated. The EU is at a turning point where the wrong decision could destroy European agricultural competitively for decades to come.

The divergent governance of gene editing in agriculture: a comparison of institutional reports from seven EU member states

Regulating gene editing in agriculture and food in the European Union: Disentangling expectations and path dependencies

Governing gene editing in agriculture and food in the United States

Regulation of gene-edited plants in Europe: from the valley of tears into the shining sun?

Genetic Technology in the Light of Food Security and Food Safety – General Report

Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada

Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing

A Doomed Technology? On Gene Editing in Bavarian Livestock Agriculture, Policy Field Conflicts and Responsible Research and Innovation

The Challenge of Regulating Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union: Trends and Issues

A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward

Institutions and the R&D of GM-crops

The European Union's deregulation of plants obtained from new genomic techniques: a critique and an alternative option

Revisiting Risk Governance of GM Plants: The Need to Consider New and Emerging Gene-Editing Techniques

Commercialization of the gene-edited crop and morality: challenges from the liberal patent law and the strict GMO law in the EU

New genomic techniques, old divides: Stakeholder attitudes towards new biotechnology regulation in the EU and UK

New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology

Using animal history to inform current debates in gene editing farm animals: A systematic review

Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom – A Review

Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion

EU regulation of genetically modified microorganisms in light of new policy developments: Possible implications for EU bioeconomy investments

Imagined futures for livestock gene editing: Public engagement in the Netherlands