Abstract:The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 has recently, for the first time, rendered the large-scale genetic modification of livestock animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens possible. Novel editing targets range from genes that curb disease vulnerabilities, increase muscle mass, or convey hornlessness, to the development of transgenic pigs for medical use. In this article, we discuss the efforts of a transdisciplinary research consortium in Bavaria, Germany, to test the technical and social feasibility of using CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing as a novel technology in Bavarian small- to medium-scale livestock agriculture. The consortium comprised life scientists, local breeding associations, legal scholars, and social scientists from Science & Technology Studies (STS) and aimed to promote Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) for gene editing technologies. Research focused on gene editing applications that improved animal health and all editing targets were co-developed with local breeding associations to meet the situated needs of small- to medium-scale livestock farmers in Bavaria. In this article, we discuss why the agricultural stakeholders in the project, that is, the representatives of local breeding associations, considered that, despite the project's success in generating positive research outcomes, it would be unlikely that results will be implemented in Bavarian livestock agriculture. We describe this situation in terms of a tension between agendas in the science and technology policy field and in the agricultural policy field in Bavaria that impacts local farmers' ability to adopt gene editing technologies. We further discuss what it might mean for RRI practices if public stakeholders are unlikely to benefit from the outcomes of RRI practices due to policy field conflicts or other contextual constraints and how STS scholars and other social scientists involved in RRI projects could adjust their practices to possibly redistribute benefits.

Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada

Imagined futures for livestock gene editing: Public engagement in the Netherlands

Governing gene editing in agriculture and food in the United States

Consumers' perceptions and acceptance of genome editing in agriculture: Insights from the United States of America and Switzerland

How does the public discuss gene-editing in agriculture? An analysis of Twitter content

The divergent governance of gene editing in agriculture: a comparison of institutional reports from seven EU member states

Identifying public trust building priorities of gene editing in agriculture and food

Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives

CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing

Using animal history to inform current debates in gene editing farm animals: A systematic review

A Doomed Technology? On Gene Editing in Bavarian Livestock Agriculture, Policy Field Conflicts and Responsible Research and Innovation

Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion

Supporters or Opponents: Will Cultural Values Shape Consumer Acceptance of Gene Editing?

Cultures in the laboratory: mapping similarities and differences between Māori and non-Māori in engaging with gene-editing technologies in Aotearoa, New Zealand

Narratives in European debate concerning new genomic techniques

The Development of Gene Editing Technology and Controversial Issues: A Discussion

Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security

Gene editing technology: shaping international standards for health and food safety assurance

Genome-edited foods

Growing knowledge impact of gene-editing technology on public acceptance: a longitudinal analysis in Japan

The Evolution of Modern Agriculture and Its Future with Biotechnology