Assessing Transportation Vulnerability to Tsunamis: Utilising Post-event Field Data from the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami, Japan, and the 2015 Illapel Tsunami, Chile

James H. Williams,Thomas M. Wilson,Nick Horspool,Ryan Paulik,Liam Wotherspoon,Emily M. Lane,Matthew W. Hughes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-332
2019-10-16
Abstract:Abstract. Transportation infrastructure is crucial to the operation of society, particularly during post-event response and recovery. Transportation assets, such as roads and bridges, can be exposed to tsunami impacts when near the coast. Using fragility functions in an impact assessment identifies potential tsunami effects to inform decisions on potential mitigation strategies. Such functions have not been available for transportation assets in the past due to limited empirical datasets. This study develops fragility functions for roads and bridges through combined survey and remotely sensed data for the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, Japan and using post-event field survey data from the 2015 Illapel Earthquake and Tsunami, Chile. The fragility functions show a trend of lower tsunami vulnerability (through lower probabilities of reaching or exceeding a given damage level) for road use categories of potentially higher construction standards. Topographic setting is also shown to affect the vulnerability of transportation assets in a tsunami with coastal plains seeing higher initial vulnerability (e.g. up to 5 m inundation depth), but coastal valleys exceeding the maximum vulnerability of roads on coastal plains (exceeding 30 m inundation depth). This study represents the first peer-reviewed example of empirical road and bridge fragility functions that consider a range of damage levels. This suite of synthesised functions is applicable to a variety of exposure and attribute types for use in global tsunami impact assessments, to inform resilience and mitigation strategies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?