Abstract:The world has witnessed corporate scandals of monstrosity magnitude. The Enron Scandal, the Nike Sweatshop scandal and the recent Johnson and Johnson baby talc in 2018 are some dishonors that reshaped the business world and reinvigorated the importance of business ethics. Indeed, supranational and national movements such as the Global Reporting Initiatives have responded to these scandals by imposing stricter corporate reporting to instill greater transparency and corporate responsibility. Ironically, despite unwavering efforts, corporations are still blatantly flouting regulations. The Volkswagen “diesel dupe” crisis is a stark reminder of the inherent weakness of current regulations. Despite Volkswagen’s staunch adherence to those stringent reporting guidelines, they breached ethics to the core, creating a tsunami of vehicle recalls, massive social, political and legal repercussions. Volkswagen’s cheat device is a ‘creative destruction’ that challenged the fundamental usefulness of corporate reporting. Corporate social responsibility has evolved tremendously, now taking the form of positivistic reporting patterns. Corporations are measured by their ecological, social and economic performance where they flamboyantly table those data and information to garner stakeholders’ support and legitimacy. However, a pragmatic approach towards corporate social responsibility is self-defeating. It erodes and dilutes a corporation’s ability to make sense, communicate and adapt to their externalities. Instead, corporations boast of their corporate prowess and triple bottom line. Using Volkswagen as a subject, this paper exposes the inherent weaknesses of a positivistic corporate reporting approach to social responsibility. A positivistic approach such as this cannot engender a truthful, honest and open posture in business corporations. Instead, this paper exemplifies that a meaningful sensemaking corporate social responsibility instills reflexive organisation change and moral transpose within corporations. This paper underlines this reflexive organisational change and moral transpose in Volkswagen as they encounter the diesel crisis. This study is novel and greatly enhances previous literatures in corporate social responsibility by instilling an appropriate model to underline these momentous reflexive organisational changes and moral transformations in Volkswagen.

Examining CEOs’ Moral Reasoning in the Automotive Industry

Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, corporate reputation, and firms’ market value: Evidence from the automobile industry

Sensemaking Corporate Social Responsibility, Reflexive Organisational Change and Moral Transpose, the Case of Volkswagen ‘Diesel Dupe’ Crisis

CEO behavior and sustainability performance: the moderating role of corporate governance

CEO Communications and ESG Performance: Deciphering the Impact of Corporate Narratives

Personal Motives, Moral Disengagement, and Unethical Decisions by Entrepreneurs: Cognitive Mechanisms on the “slippery Slope”

Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Global Automakers in Asia: Application of Carroll Model with Multi-Case Study Method

An Exploratory Study on Corporate Governance From Neuro-Governance Lenses in the Malaysian Context

Differences in CEO Communication Strategies between High- and Low-Performing Firms in the Global Auto Parts Industry

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Fuel Firm Performance? Evidence from the Asian Automotive Sector

The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies

CEO narcissism and ESG misconduct

CEO personality and corporate sustainability performance

Does CEO media exposure affect corporate social responsibility?

Do CEO Rhetorical Strategies Affect Corporate Social Performance? Evidence from China

A new insight on CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility (CSR): A meta-analytical review

Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors

The Moral Psychology and Exemplarism of Leaders in Advertising

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

CEO Humility and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence Based on a New Unobtrusive Measure

Do CEO overconfidence and narcissism affect corporate social responsibility in the UK listed companies? The moderating role of corporate governance