Abstract:Purpose In light of the conflict between scholarly findings supporting corporate social responsibility’s positive impact on corporate financial performance (CFP) versus findings showing negative impact on CFP, the academic literature has reoriented toward determining the contingency conditions that affect the underlying relationships. This paper aims to investigate two potential contingency factors, the chief executive officer’s (CEO) corporate social responsibility (CSR) expertise and board members’ CSR expertise. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses an unbalanced panel of archival data of 168 firms from the S&P 500 index for the period 2006–2013. The analytic model is estimated using the feasible generalized least squares regression method with heteroscedasticity and panel-specific AR1 autocorrelation. Findings The findings reinforce the perspective that CSR positively affects the firm’s financial performance. The authors find that firms realize optimal results from their CSR investments when both the board and the CEO have greater CSR expertise. In other words, both, CEO CSR expertise and board CSR expertise positively impact the CSR–CFP relationship. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study advance the literature in three important areas, namely, the social responsibility–financial responsibility relationship, the governance literature and upper echelons theory. First, the theoretical arguments and the empirical evidence highlight that CSR–CFP relationship is at least partly contingent upon the CEO’s and board members’ CSR expertise. Second, this study introduces two important variables: the CEO and board’s CSR experience as proxies for their CSR expertise. Future researchers may consider decomposing the various components of CSR to study the differential impact of each component on financial performance. Practical implications First, this study finds that while the CEO CSR expertise may be of value for the firm, such value can only be realized under a capable and effective board that has adequate knowledge in the field of CSR. Second, this study shows that the best-case scenario for firms occurs when both its board members and CEO have had greater prior CSR involvement that contributed to their knowledge inventory and skills. Greater knowledge and skills enhance the quality of the decisions that comprise the firm’s CSR strategy. Originality/value While it seems intuitive that prior CSR knowledge and expertise should lead to more and better CSR initiatives, there are few if any studies that empirically examine the effects of this premise on a firm’s financial performance. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study appears to be the first that directly tests the relationship between executives’ CSR experience and firm performance.

A new insight on CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility (CSR): A meta-analytical review

Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity.

A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance

Empirical examination of the direct and moderating role of corporate social responsibility in top executive compensation

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Incumbent Employees: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review

Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis

The value of expertise: how chief executive officer and board corporate social responsibility expertise enhance the financial effects of firms’ corporate social responsibility initiatives

Employee-level consequences of perceived internal and external CSR: decoding the moderation and mediation paths

Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives

Do Academic CEOs Influence Corporate Social Irresponsibility? the Moderating Effects of Negative Attainment Discrepancy and Slack Resources

CEO Communications and ESG Performance: Deciphering the Impact of Corporate Narratives

CEO Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility, CEO characteristics, and earnings management: Evidence from China

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

Employee Psychological Reactions to Micro-Corporate Social Responsibility and Societal Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

Do CEO overconfidence and narcissism affect corporate social responsibility in the UK listed companies? The moderating role of corporate governance

CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes

CEO Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Moderated Mediation Model

Power and Responsibility: How Different Sources of CEO Power Affect Firms' Corporate Social Responsibility Practices