Do we need dedicated cardiac SPECT systems?

Piotr Slomka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01921-7
2019-10-24
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Abstract:Dedicated cardiac SPECT scanners have significantly improved in recent years,<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR1">1</a></span> reducing imaging time and radiation dose. In particular, cardiac scanners have entered clinical practice,<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR2">2</a></span>,<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR3">3</a></span> which use solid-state Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) crystal detectors and feature innovative gantry designs, focusing on the heart. These new systems allow improvement in photon sensitivity (5-8 times higher) <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR4">4</a></span>,<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR5">5</a></span> for cardiac imaging, as well as image resolution (up to 2 times higher).<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR5">5</a></span> While solid-state CZT detectors are more expensive than traditional NaI(Tl) crystal detectors with photomultipliers, they do have important imaging advantages. The CZT detectors have improved energy response, which significantly reduces the scatter component of measured data. They also offer superior intrinsic spatial resolution compared to conventional Anger cameras. The use of less-bulky detectors (no need for photomultipliers) has resulted in more compact scanner size which has facilitated small-footprint dedicated cardiac camera designs with custom imaging geometries and high-sensitivity collimation. There is a growing evidence, including large multicenter studies, that these solid-state SPECT systems demonstrate excellent diagnostic and prognostic utility in cardiac imaging.<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR6">6</a></span>, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR7">7</a></span>, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR8">8</a></span>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?