Abstract:Incorporating fresh members into teams is considered a pathway to team creativity. However, whether freshness improves team performance or not remains unclear, as well as the optimal involvement of fresh members for team performance. Focusing on team impact, one important dimension of team performance, this study uses a group of authors on the byline of a publication as a proxy for a scientific team and quantifies team impact by citations of a paper authored by this team, i.e., article team impact. We extend an indicator, i.e., article team freshness, to measure the extent to which a scientific team incorporates new members, by calculating the fraction of new collaboration relations established within the team. Based on more than 43 million scientific publications covering more than a half-century of research from Microsoft Academic Graph, this study provides a holistic picture of the current development of article team freshness by outlin-ing the temporal evolution of freshness, and its disciplinary distribution. Subsequently, using a multivariable regression approach, we examine the association between article team freshness and papers' short-term and long-term citations. The major findings are as follows: (1) article team freshness in scientific teams has been increasing in the past half-century; (2) there exists an inverted-U-shaped association between article team freshness and papers' citations in all the disciplines and different periods; (3) article team impact is hampered by article team freshness in small-sized teams, while medium-sized and large-sized teams can benefit more from article team freshness before the fraction of new collaboration reaches its turning point. The findings of this study provide implications for the practice of team formation and team management in science.

The importance of research teams with diverse backgrounds: Research collaboration in the Journal of Productivity Analysis

Are We Playing the Same Game?: Publishing Task Environments and Research Productivity Among Management Specialists

Networks And Productivity -- A Study In Economic Scholars During COVID-19

The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants

The Impact of a Researcher’s Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis

Understanding Teams and Productivity in Information Retrieval Research (2000-2018): Academia, Industry, and Cross-Community Collaborations

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Organizational Distance Also Matters: How Organizational Distance Among Industrial Research Teams Affect Their Research Productivity

Sited, Sighted, and Cited: The Effect of JSTOR in Economic Research

Working Paper Series Enhancing Productivity : The Role of Management Practices

Co-contributorship Network and Division of Labor in Individual Scientific Collaborations

MEASURING RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF MARKETING SCHOLARS AND MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

Analysis of Collaboration Evolution in AHP Research: 1982-2018

Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

Investigating Scientific Collaboration Through the Sequence of Authors in the Publication Bylines and the Diversity of Collaborators.

Enhancing Productivity: The Role of Management Practices

Team formation and team impact: The balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration

Understanding scientific collaboration: Homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment

Untangling the Network Effects of Productivity and Prominence among Scientists

Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes