Differences in adhesion between 1C-PUR and MUF wood adhesives to (ligno)cellulosic surfaces revealed by nanoindentation

Sabine Herzele,Hendrikus WG. van Herwijnen,Thomas Griesser,Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter,Carina Rößler,Johannes Konnerth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102507
IF: 3.848
2020-04-01
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
Abstract:The chemical composition of adhesive and adherend involved in a bondline strongly influences the resulting adhesion performance. In this study, nanoindentation was used to mechanically characterize the interface between three chemically different (ligno)cellulosic fiber types and two chemically different adhesives. Regenerated cellulose, virgin wood, and thermally modified fibers were embedded in one-component polyurethane (1C-PUR) and melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF).The results from nanoindentation at the interface between 1C-PUR adhesive and the three fiber types show best adhesion towards the thermally modified fiber surface. In contrast, MUF shows almost identical adhesion behavior for all three fiber type surfaces. Differences in adhesion behavior due to varying fiber surface chemistry seem to be superseded by adhesive penetration into the bulk fiber, which is only expected for MUF adhesive.In addition, chemical surface analysis of the virgin wood and thermally modified fibers was carried out by X-ray Photon Spectroscopy and compared to literature values for regenerated cellulose. Cellulose values show the highest O/C ratio followed by virgin wood fibers and thermally modified fibers. These results are hinting on a higher amount of lignin or hydrophobic extractives on the thermally modified fiber surface. In terms of adhesion performance, these results indicate that the less polar thermally modified fibers surface seems to be favorable for 1C-PUR.
materials science, multidisciplinary,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?