Outcome parameters in speech audiometry: retrospective analysis of data and reporting quality in clinical studies

Joseph Morgenstern,Susen Lailach,Thomas Zahnert,Marcus Neudert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05734-9

2019-11-23

Abstract:ObjectivesThe use of standardized outcome parameters is essential for the comparability of clinical studies. Pure-tone audiometry and speech audiometry are widely used, but there is no systematic evaluation of the outcome parameters in clinical application. Nevertheless, there is presumably a great heterogeneity especially in the field of speech audiometry. This study presents a snapshot of the current situation of documentation and usage of outcome parameters in otologic research.Study designRetrospective study of existing literature analyzing common speech audiometric test material and procedureMain outcome measuresIntervention Studies from 2012 to 2016 concerning hearing ability were eligible for evaluation. Studies were analyzed with regard to study design, pathology and intervention, speech audiometric parameters, pure-tone audiometry, implementation of reporting standards and journal related data.Results279 studies were included. Over 50% of the analyzed studies lacked proper documentation. In the remaining studies, there was a broad variance concerning the documented speech audiometric parameters, most often with a fixed presentation level of 65 dB SPL.ConclusionThe lack of generally used standards for reporting hearing outcomes makes it difficult to compare results of different clinical studies. An adequate description of the methods would be a first and important step in improving reports on audiological outcomes.

otorhinolaryngology