Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Fit vs Audiologist-Fit Hearing Aids
Karina C. De Sousa,Vinaya Manchaiah,David R. Moore,Marien A. Graham,De Wet Swanepoel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1825
2024-07-11
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Abstract:Importance With rising interest in over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids as an alternative to traditional audiologist-fit devices, understanding their long-term efficacy is crucial. However, given the novelty of the US Food and Drug Administration category of OTC hearing aids, minimal evidence currently supports their long-term efficacy. Objective To compare the long-term self-reported outcomes at 8 months of self-fit OTC hearing aids to the same hearing aids fit by audiologists. Design, Setting, and Participants Building on a previous randomized clinical trial, this follow-up comparative effectiveness research study reassessed a number of the original participants that were not lost to follow-up. Participants were initially divided into those with self-fit OTC hearing aids and those with audiologist-fit devices. Approximately 8 months after fitting, participants completed self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were addressed through multiple imputation. The original noninferiority trial was conducted at the University of Pretoria in South Africa from April 2022 to August 2022. The current analysis took place between July 7, 2023, to November 20, 2023. Interventions In the original trial, participants in the self-fit device group received a pair of OTC hearing aids and independently fit them with remote support as needed. The audiologist-fit device group received the same hearing aids fit by a certified audiologist using best practices. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were self-reported hearing aid benefit, measured using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Results Of 64 participants in the trial, 44 participants were included in the extension study (21 [47.7%] in the audiologist-fit group; 23 [52.3%] in the self-fit group). The mean (SD) age of these participants was 63.0 (13.2) years, and 21 (47.7%) were male. At the long-term follow-up, self-fit and audiologist-fit groups showed no significant differences in the APHAB global score (mean difference, 0.02 [95% CI, −7.1 to 7.1]; Cohen d , 0.01 [95% CI, −0.5 to 0.5]) or the IOI-HA total score (mean difference, 1.5 [95% CI, −1.4 to 4.4]; Cohen d , 0.3 [95% CI, −0.2 to 0.8]). From 6 weeks to 8 months, no clinically meaningful group-time interaction was found between groups for the APHAB global score (Cohen d , 0.1 [95% CI, −0.2 to 0.3]), but a significant interaction for the IOI-HA total score was found (Cohen d , −0.6 [95% CI, −0.8 to −0.3]), with the self-fit group generally performing better. Conclusion This comparative effectiveness research study demonstrated that self-fit OTC hearing aids can offer comparable long-term benefits to audiologist-fit hearing aids for individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss.
surgery,otorhinolaryngology