Abstract:Abstract The pervasiveness of Computer Science (CS) in today’s digital society and the extensive use of computational methods in other sciences call for its introduction in the school curriculum. Hence, Computer Science Education is becoming more and more relevant. In CS K-12 education, computational thinking (CT) is one of the abused buzzwords: different stakeholders (media, educators, politicians) give it different meanings, some more oriented to CS, others more linked to its interdisciplinary value. The expression was introduced by two leading researchers, Jeannette Wing (in 2006) and Seymour Papert (much early, in 1980), each of them stressing different aspects of a common theme. This paper will use a historical approach to review, discuss, and put in context these first two educational and epistemological approaches to CT. We will relate them to today’s context and evaluate what aspects are still relevant for CS K-12 education. Of the two, particular interest is devoted to “Papert’s CT,” which is the lesser-known and the lesser-studied. We will conclude that “Wing’s CT” and “Papert’s CT,” when correctly understood, are both relevant to today’s computer science education. From Wing, we should retain computer science’s centrality, CT being the (scientific and cultural) substratum of the technical competencies. Under this interpretation, CT is a lens and a set of categories for understanding the algorithmic fabric of today’s world. From Papert, we should retain the constructionist idea that only a social and affective involvement of students into the technical content will make programming an interdisciplinary tool for learning (also) other disciplines. We will also discuss the often quoted (and often unverified) claim that CT automatically “transfers” to other broad 21st century skills. Our analysis will be relevant for educators and scholars to recognize and avoid misconceptions and build on the two core roots of CT.

Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Computational thinking: Enhancing STEAM and engineering education, from theory to practice

The computational thinking for science (CT-S) framework: operationalizing CT-S for K–12 science education researchers and educators

Computational Thinking in Introductory Physics

Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science Curriculum: an Examination of Activities that Support Students’ Computational Thinking in the Service of Disciplinary Learning

Interdisciplinary Integration of Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review

Integrating computational thinking into K-12 education: Bridging the gap between theories and practices

Computational Thinking for Science: Positioning coding as a tool for doing science

Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it Fit? A systematic literary review

Computational thinking in primary education: a systematic literature review

Instructional practices promoting computational thinking in STEAM elementary classrooms

Computational Thinking and Metacognition

Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing

Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: a systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning

Teacher Education to Integrate Computational Thinking into Elementary Science: A Design-Based Research Study

Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework

Knowledge mapping of Computational Thinking and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CT+STEM)

Assessing Students' Computational Thinking In A Learning By Modeling Environment

Developing Computational Thinking through Mathematics: An Evaluative Scientific Mapping

How do Teachers Apply Computational Thinking Activities in Elementary School? From Continuing Education to the classroom

Integrating Computing in the Statistics and Data Science Curriculum: Creative Structures, Novel Skills and Habits, and Ways to Teach Computational Thinking