Abstract:Scientists, resource managers, and decision‐makers increasingly use knowledge co‐production to guide the stewardship of future landscapes under climate change. This process was applied in the California Central Valley, USA to solve complex conservation problems, where managed wetlands and croplands are flooded between fall and spring to support some of the largest concentrations of shorebirds and waterfowl in the world. We co‐produced scenario narratives, spatially‐explicit flooded waterbird habitat models, data products, and new knowledge about climate adaptation potential. We document our co‐production process, and using the co‐produced models, we ask: "when and where do management actions make a difference?" and "when does climate override these actions?" The outcomes of this process provide lessons learned on how to co‐create usable information and how to increase climate adaptive capacity in a highly managed landscape. We found that: 1) actions to restore wetlands and prioritize their water supply create habitat outcomes resilient to climate change impacts particularly in March, when habitat is most limited, 2) land protection combined with management can increase the ecosystem's resilience to climate change, and 3) the uptake and use of this information was influenced by the roles of different stakeholders, plus rapidly changing water policies, discrepancies in decision‐making time frames, and immediate crises of extreme drought. While a broad stakeholder group contributed knowledge to scenario narratives and model development, to co‐produce usable information, data products were tailored to a small set of decision contexts, leading to fewer stakeholder participants over time. A boundary organization convened stakeholders across a large landscape, and early adopters helped to build legitimacy, yet broad‐scale use of climate adaptation knowledge will depend on state and local policies, engagement with decision‐makers that have legislative and budgetary authority, and the capacity to fit data products to specific decision needs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Making room and moving over: knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making

Centring Indigenous peoples in knowledge exchange research-practice by resetting assumptions, relationships and institutions

The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice

Misunderstanding the ‘‘nature’’ of co-management: a geography of regulatory science and indigenous knowledges (IK)

Placing diverse knowledge systems at the core of transformative climate research

Indigenous Participation and the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge and Perspectives in Global Environmental Governance Forums: a Systematic Review

Taking care of knowledge, taking care of salmon: towards Indigenous data sovereignty in an era of climate change and cumulative effects

Challenges and Strategies for Knowledge Co-Production in Ecosystem and Natural Hazards Research

‘Thinking with Kaipara’: A decolonising methodological strategy to illuminate social heterogenous nature–culture relations in place

A multidimensional approach to knowledge coproduction in glaciology

Rescaling Knowledge and Governance and Enrolling the Future in New Zealand: A Co-Production Analysis of Canterbury’s Water Management Reforms to Regulate Diffuse Pollution

Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research

Knowledge and Environmental Citizenship

Centering Knowledge Co-Production in Sustainability Science: Why, How, and When

A review of Indigenous knowledge and participation in environmental monitoring

Knowledge Co-Production with Agricultural Trade Associations

Responsible Action as Embedded in Knowledge Practices: An Analysis of Forest Biodiversity Protection

Holding up a mirror: researching symmetrically to explore exclusion, othering and whiteness in local environmental governance

Indigenous Feminisms: Disturbing Colonialism in Environmental Science Partnerships

Ecological research 'in a good way' means ethical and equitable relationships with Indigenous Peoples and Lands

Knowledge coproduction on the impact of decisions for waterbird habitat in a changing climate