Abstract:Simple Summary As dogs evolve to fill a new and increased number of roles in human societies, it is critical that we understand how they communicate with people. Here, we investigate whether markings on dogs’ faces influence how expressive they are perceived to be by humans. Using standardized systems to analyze dogs’ facial complexity and behaviors, we find that dogs with plainer faces (fewer markings) objectively score as more behaviorally expressive. Age and skill or training level also impact expressivity, with adult dogs being more expressive than senior dogs and dogs that are highly skilled being more expressive than those who have had no training or working experience. Interestingly, dogs tend to use their face more “wholistically” during highly social interactions with owners than when presented with ambiguous cues, and owners of adult dogs with plainer faces tend to be more accurate at judging their dog’s expressivity. These data are important to consider as the human–dog relationship continues to develop, both from an evolutionary perspective and especially in the context of canine training and welfare. Abstract Facial phenotypes are significant in communication with conspecifics among social primates. Less is understood about the impact of such markers in heterospecific encounters. Through behavioral and physical phenotype analyses of domesticated dogs living in human households, this study aims to evaluate the potential impact of superficial facial markings on dogs’ production of human-directed facial expressions. That is, this study explores how facial markings, such as eyebrows, patches, and widow’s peaks, are related to expressivity toward humans. We used the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS) as an objective measure of expressivity, and we developed an original schematic for a standardized coding of facial patterns and coloration on a sample of more than 100 male and female dogs (N = 103), aged from 6 months to 12 years, representing eight breed groups. The present study found a statistically significant, though weak, correlation between expression rate and facial complexity, with dogs with plainer faces tending to be more expressive (r = −0.326, p ≤ 0.001). Interestingly, for adult dogs, human companions characterized dogs’ rates of facial expressivity with more accuracy for dogs with plainer faces. Especially relevant to interspecies communication and cooperation, within-subject analyses revealed that dogs’ muscle movements were distributed more evenly across their facial regions in a highly social test condition compared to conditions in which they received ambiguous cues from their owners. On the whole, this study provides an original evaluation of how facial features may impact communication in human–dog interactions.

Differences in facial expressions during positive anticipation and frustration in dogs awaiting a reward

Evaluating the accuracy of facial expressions as emotion indicators across contexts in dogs

Dogs and humans respond to emotionally competent stimuli by producing different facial actions

Assessing positive emotional states in dogs using heart rate and heart rate variability

Dogs distinguish authentic human emotions without being empathic

Evaluation of indicators of acute emotional states in dogs

The Processing of Human Emotional Faces by Pet and Lab Dogs: Evidence for Lateralization and Experience Effects

Owner perceptions of companion dog expressions of positive emotional states and the contexts in which they occur

Orienting asymmetries and physiological reactivity in dogs’ response to human emotional faces

Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions

Deep Learning Models for Automated Classification of Dog Emotional States from Facial Expressions

Intra and interspecific audience effect on domestic dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions

What Is Written on a Dog’s Face? Evaluating the Impact of Facial Phenotypes on Communication between Humans and Canines

Empathy enhances decoding accuracy of human neurophysiological responses to emotional facial expressions of humans and dogs

Still face in pet dogs (Canis familiaris).

Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?

Lateralized behavior and cardiac activity of dogs in response to human emotional vocalizations

The value of a real face: Differences between affective faces and emojis in neural processing and their social influence on decision-making

When are puppies receptive to emotion-induced human chemosignals? The cases of fear and happiness

Coyotes can do 'puppy dog eyes' too: comparing interspecific variation in Canis facial expression muscles

Assessing the Relationship Between Emotional States of Dogs and Their Human Handlers, Using Simultaneous Behavioral and Cardiac Measures