Abstract:Pakistan's alternative dispute resolution landscape faces challenges and variations in effectiveness across regions. While Islamabad exhibits successful implementation due to factors like education, ADR facilities, and government support, Punjab and KPK encounter obstacles like limited access, scarcity of skilled practitioners, cultural influences, and economic considerations. The research underscores the need for a concerted effort to address these challenges and promote ADR awareness, emphasizing the importance of government, civil society and stakeholders in ensuring widespread acceptance and accessibility. As outlined in this research below, ADR offers advantages over traditional court systems. This includes party control, confidentiality, time and cost savings, expertise, finality of awards and societal benefits. The paper further underscores the evolution of ADR, incorporating online platforms and virtual mediation sessions to enhance accessibility of efficiency. In the broader context of legal frameworks, the study compares ADR Acts in Islamabad, Punjab, and KPK. While similarities exist, differences in scope, the role of ADR centers, the concept of Saliseen that are present in KPK and no such concept in the other two Acts, and dispute types are notable. The effectiveness of these acts varies, requiring a nuanced approach to implementations and awareness campaigns tailored to regional nuance. Ultimately, the research concludes with a forward-looking perspective on the potential transformative impacts of ADR in Pakistan. Emphasizing its role in fostering economic growth, reducing legal costs, and promoting fairness, the study envisions a society where ADR has become a widely accepted and accessible mechanism for dispute resolution.

Trust in State and Nonstate Actors: Evidence from Dispute Resolution in Pakistan

Social Trust and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

The Performance Effect of Inter-Firm Trust in Corrupt Environments: A Signaling Theory Perspective

Trust and State Effectiveness: The Political Economy of Compliance

Public and Professionals’ Perceptions of Wrongful Convictions in Pakistan: Scale Development and Validation

Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan

Civil war violence and political trust: Microlevel evidence from Nepal

Trust of Socially Vulnerable Groups on Criminal Justice System of Pakistan

Direct elections and Trust in State and political institutions: Evidence from Indonesia's election reform

Combating Cynicism with Empowering Justice

Trust and well‐being: Evidence from Indonesia

Stabilizing Civil Wars without Peacekeeping: Evidence from South Asia

Employee Engagement, Fairness and Trust: an Empirical Assessment

Mistrust, Misperception, and Misunderstanding: Imperfect Information and Conflict Dynamics

Information and Bargaining through Agents: Experimental Evidence from Mexico’s Labour Courts

Comparative Study of Alternate Dispute Resolution in Islamabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab

Can Bureaucrats Break Trust? Testing Cultural and Institutional Theories of Trust with Chinese Panel Data

Testing the effects of group-affirmation in active conflict: Ukrainians' trust toward Russia

Institutional Favoritism, Income, and Political Trust: Evidence from Jordan

The Impact of Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance on Public Trust in the Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban Yemen

Lavish Returns on Cheap Talk: Non-Binding Communication in a Trust Experiment