Response to: ‘The cost of arthralgia ‘pretreatment’ to prevent rheumatoid arthritis’ by Rothschild

Annette van der Helm-van Mil,Robert BM Landewé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216984
IF: 27.973
2020-01-24
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Abstract:We read the letter from Rothschild with interest.1 We agree that we need more data and better evidence on: (1) how to determine the risk of patients with arthralgia progressing to 'true RA' and on (2) whether or not Disease Modifying AntiRheumatic Drug (DMARD) treatment is better than placebo in this phase. Both points were discussed in our Viewpoint.2 Cost–benefit analyses can only be performed afterwards. Rothschild seems to agree with us not to condone treating patients presenting with arthralgia with DMARDs, pending further evidence. Still, there are different opinions in the field. This is illustrated by a recent study from the UK, in which rheumatologists were asked about their management in clinical practice of arthralgia patients with positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies antibodies and signs of synovitis on power Doppler in at least one joint, but in the absence of clinically apparent arthritis. Seventy-one...
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?