The cost of arthralgia ‘pretreatment’ to prevent rheumatoid arthritis

Bruce M Rothschild
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216981
IF: 27.973
2020-01-24
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Abstract:The article by Helm-van Mil and Landewé1 represents the tip of the iceberg. Justifying initiation of medications, in the absence of clinical or radiological evidence because an individual might at some time develop a particular disease is a speculative approach. We are now in an era of evidence-based medicine and such evidence is currently lacking for recognition of who will develop rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Actually, even controlled studies of undifferentiated arthritis failed to reveal progression to RA.2–4 If progression to RA was not evidenced in those individuals who actually initially had arthritis, why would we have higher expectations for arthralgia? That speculation seems fallacious. We have no idea what percentage, if any, of individuals with arthralgia will go on to develop RA. Even if medicinal interventions routinely utilised in the treatment of RA were without harmful side effects, their...
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?