Efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

Lin Liu,Hongmei Yan,MingFeng Xia,Lin Zhao,Minzhi Lv,Naiqin Zhao,Shengxiang Rao,Xiuzhong Yao,Weiyun Wu,Baishen Pan,Hua Bian,Xin Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3292
2020-02-10
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We performed a 24‐week randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Seventy‐six patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive exenatide or insulin glargine treatment. The endpoints included changes in liver fat content (LFC), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, blood glucose, liver enzymes, lipid profile, body weight, and FIB‐4 index (FIB‐4).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>LFC, VAT, SAT, and FIB‐4 were significantly reduced after exenatide treatment (ΔLFC ‐17.55 ± 12.93%, ΔVAT ‐43.57 ± 68.20 cm<sup>2</sup>, ΔSAT ‐28.44 ± 51.48 cm<sup>2</sup>, ΔFIB‐4 ‐0.10 ± 0.26, all P &lt; 0.05). In comparison, only LFC (ΔLFC ‐10.49 ± 11.38%, P &lt; 0.05), and not VAT, SAT, or FIB‐4 index (all P &gt; 0.05), was reduced after insulin glargine treatment. Moreover, exenatide treatment resulted in greater reductions in alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) than insulin glargine (P &lt; 0.05). The body weight, waist circumference, postprandial plasma glucose, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) in the exenatide group also presented greater reductions than the insulin glargine group (P &lt; 0.05). The proportion of adverse events were comparable between the two groups. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced LFC in patients with drug‐naive T2DM and NAFLD; however, exenatide showed greater reductions in body weight, visceral fat area, liver enzymes, FIB‐4, postprandial plasma glucose, and LDL‐C.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?