Abstract:The provision of tenure security for residents of informal settlements has been among the highest ranking and most debated topics on the development agenda. Some have fervently argued for the distribution of property title to establish security and generate incentives for investment in housing improvement. Others have argued that it is the security as perceived that determines whether and how much dwellers invest. This article examines the psychological pathways through which titling is supposed to work, hypothesizing that they operate largely through increases in perceptions of security. This is done by capitalizing on a natural experiment in which half of the residents of an informal settlement in Buenos Aires received property title, while allocation to the other half was delayed due to a legal restriction. The results show that perceptions of security partially mediated the titling–investment relationship and shed new light on the debate by laying bare the psychological mechanisms of dweller decision making. Apporter la sécurité d’occupation aux habitants des logements informels fait partie des sujets prioritaires les plus débattus en matière de développement. Certains ont ardemment défendu la distribution de titres de propriété comme moyen de fournir une garantie et d’inciter à investir dans l’amélioration de l’habitat. D’autres avancent que c’est la sécurité subjective qui détermine la décision ou les modalités d’investissement chez la plupart des occupants. Ce travail examine les cheminements psychologiques grâce auxquels l’attribution de titres de propriété est censée fonctionner, en supposant qu’ils opèrent le plus souvent via un accroissement du sentiment de sécurité. Pour ce faire, il se sert d’un cas expérimental naturel dans lequel la moitié des habitants de logements informels de Buenos Aires ont reçu un titre de propriété, tandis qu’une contrainte légale retardait l’attribution à l’autre moitié. D’après les résultats, le sentiment de sécurité a facilité en partie la relation propriété‐investissement et a éclairé le débat en dévoilant les mécanismes psychologiques qui interviennent dans la décision des habitants.

The Virtuous Cycle of Property

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

The Level of Decentralization and Property Rights Protection––a Sociological Analysis of Property Rights

Strangers’ property

Trust in Private and Common Property Experiments

Why do elites extend property rights: unlocking investment and the switch to public goods

Competition among the Elites, Property Rights Protection and Economic Performance

Endowment Effects in Evolutionary Game Theory: Enhancing Property Rights

The Political Economy of Legal Titling

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements

Property Rights, Finance, and Reinvestment: Evidence from China's Private Enterprises

A Model of Enclosures: Coordination, Conflict, and Efficiency in the Transformation of Land Property Rights

Then I'll Huff, and I'll Puff, and I'll . . . : A Natural Experiment on Property Titling, Housing Improvement and the Psychology of Tenure Security

Intrinsic adherence to law: physical versus intellectual property

Endogenous property rights, credit market, and economic development

The Role and Connotation of Individual Ability Difference in Origin of Property Rights

Africa's resource curse: The key role of property rights

Property Rights and Productivity: The Case of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam

Property between Natural and Acquired Right