Abstract:Although increasing attention has been given to the need to engage local communities and facilitate community resilience, discrepancies between theory and practice remain evident. Myths, misconceptions and mistakes persist in post-disaster emergency operations, and in the reconstruction and re-development efforts following disaster. The ‘command and control’ approach typically deployed by disaster management agencies results in an increasing dependency on external support and annihilates the potentialities of local communities. Learning lessons from post-disaster interventions is important in order to better understand how to orient development interventions, especially those addressed to the sustainable development of vulnerable areas, such as mountain and rural territories. We emphasise the importance of recognizing community resilience and the capacity of local communities to self-organise. We describe examples of community resilience in action as it occurred following the earthquake in the Province of L'Aquila in the Abruzzo region of central Italy on 6 April 2009. We discuss the aftershock economies and aftershock societies that developed in the extraordinary communities that emerged around rural villages in the mountain areas around L'Aquila. A multi-methods approach was used, primarily drawing on personal experiences of life in the autonomous locally-organised camps that were established in rural areas following the earthquake. We conclude that the persistence of various disaster myths and the failure to acknowledge community resilience undermine more effective, socially-sustainable, disaster management and rural development planning. Learning from the post-disaster communities that arose in the L'Aquila post-earthquake mountain territory, we argue that in post-disaster management and in rural development planning, there should be a greater awareness of the underlying community resilience, and we suggest that greater attention should be given to understanding, recognizing and strengthening the capacities of local communities and the resilient social processes they put into action in order to address the negative social and economic impacts they experience during crises.

Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster: Implications for community resilience

Belonging and Inclusivity Make a Resilient Future for All: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Post-Flood Social Capital in a Diverse Australian Rural Community

What lies beyond social capital? The role of social psychology in building community resilience to climate change.

Religiosity and Social Support Predict Resilience in Older Adults After a Flood

Community resilience to crime: A study of the 2011 Brisbane flood

Community resilience and flooding in UK guidance: A critical review of concepts, definitions, and their implications

Perceptions of Urban Community Resilience: Beyond Disaster Recovery in the Face of Climate Change

Exploring the role of social capital in community flood resiliency in Binghamton, NY

Strengthening opportunities to integrate informal resilience practices in formal flood resilience planning

Can community interventions change resilience? Fostering perceptions of individual and community resilience in rural places

General Resilience to Cope with Extreme Events

'When it floods, we work on our own': Exploring factors influencing collective efficacy appraisals for community‐level flood measures among urban informal settlements in Suva, Fiji

Ecological and Human Community Resilience in Response to Natural Disasters

Social Capital and Community Resilience

The Lost Creek Fire: managing social relations under disaster conditions

Longitudinal assessment of mental health after a flood: roles of social support, hope, recovery stressors, and prior lifetime trauma

Differential Mental Health Impact Six Months After Extensive River Flooding in Rural Australia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Through an Equity Lens

Experiencing local community resilience in action: Learning from post-disaster communities

Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach

A natural catastrophic turnover event: individual sociality matters despite community resilience in wild house mice

Resilient dwellings or resilient people? Towards people-centred reconstruction