Abstract:The working hypothesis of international financial regulation is that it should be globally harmonized. This paper contends, to the contrary, that we should be wary about the efficacy of global harmonization, and in particular, harmonization of systemic risk measurement and regulation. The thesis is informed by what I consider two key lessons from the recent global financial crisis. The first lesson is that, when business strategies that internationally-harmonized regulation induces banks to follow go seriously awry, the adverse consequences will spread globally and not be limited to one regulator’s domain. The second lesson is that, innovations in financial technology that have been engines of prosperity across the globe also may contain the seeds of financial calamity with imprudent use and regulatory inattention. In addition, three kinds of uncertainty operate in this context: i) uncertainty regarding how best to define and measure systemic risk; (ii), dynamic uncertainty, that financial institutions respond to regulation in unpredictable ways that tend to undermine regulatory effectiveness; and (iii) radical uncertainty, that we do not know all possible future states of the financial system and therefore cannot compute the probabilities of outcomes that would be necessary for informing rules regarding systemic risk measures. The uncertainty in the regulatory context, in conjunction with the lessons from the crisis, suggest that a value-added international regulatory strategy would foster at least a modicum of diversity across national regulatory regimes, along with periodic updating of global standards. At the national level, they suggest adopting a dual-pronged regulatory approach that focuses regulators’ attention on monitoring developments in short-term debt markets, leverage levels, and the impact of new financial products and services, as well as on promoting experimentation, to better inform regulatory decisionmaking.

The unintended consequences of regulatory import: the Basel Accord’s failure during the financial crisis

Pitfalls of Global Harmonization of Systemic Risk Regulation in a World of Financial Innovation

Domesticating Foreign Finance

Do financial regulators act in the public's interest? A Bayesian latent class estimation framework for assessing regulatory responses to banking crises

Regulating for Financial System Development, Financial Institutions Stability, and Financial Innovation

Leverage-induced systemic risk under Basle II and other credit risk policies

THE GAME BETWEEN SECURITIZATION AND CAPITAL REGULATION

Deconstructing the Liability of Foreignness: Regulatory Enforcement Actions Against Foreign Banks

An Excursion-Theoretic Approach to Regulator's Bank Reorganization Problem

Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options

Basel III capital surcharges for G-SIBs fail to control systemic risk and can cause pro-cyclical side effects

BANK PANICS AND FIRE SALES, INSOLVENCY AND ILLIQUIDITY

Agency Conflicts, Bank Capital Regulation and Accounting Measurement

Network-Sensitive Financial Regulation

Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts?

IMPLICIT BANK DEBT GUARANTEES: COSTS, BENEFITS AND RISKS

Assessing the Basel II Internal Ratings-Based Approach: Empirical Evidence from Australia

Risk-taking and systemic banking crisis in Africa: do regulatory policy framework provide new insight in threshold models?

The invention of operational risk

Sovereign Risk Spill-Overs to Banking Sectors in Central America and the Caribbean

Accounting-Driven Bank Monitoring and Firms' Debt Structure: Evidence from IFRS 9 Adoption