Abstract:Intercultural pragmatics is usually associated with pragmatic di¤erences between di¤erent languages. This seems to be the default reading of the term. However, this reading tacitly ignores that there is no one-to-one relationship between languages and cultures.1 Speakers who share the same native language do not necessarily share the same culture. For instance, native speakers of English in Ireland and the United States use language in di¤erent ways (e.g., Schneider 1999, 2008). Neither do Americans in the US all use English in the same way (cf., e.g., Barron 2009; Wolfram and Schilling 2006: 93–101). On the other hand, cultures may be shared by speakers with di¤erent native languages. Thus, as language use in interaction is shaped by cultural values, pragmatic similarities may occur across languages, while pragmatic di¤erences may occur across varieties of the same language. Variational pragmatics is a subdiscipline of intercultural pragmatics. Other subdisciplines include contrastive pragmatics, cross-cultural pragmatics, ethnopragmatics, interlanguage pragmatics, and postcolonial pragmatics. Contrastive pragmatics is concerned with inter-lingual di¤erences, i.e., with pragmatic variation between di¤erent languages. Crosscultural pragmatics, on the other hand, compares the ways in which different languages are used in communication. It also deals with native speaker—non-native speaker interaction and with lingua franca communication (cf. Blum-Kulka et al. 1989; House-Edmondson 1986: 282).2 Ethnopragmatics is concerned with explaining speech practices in terms of a culture-internal perspective (e.g., in terms of values) rather than in terms of presumed pragmatic universals (cf. Goddard 2006). Interlanguage pragmatics focuses on the specific nature of language use conventions in learner language, e.g., in the English as a foreign language spoken by native speakers of German, and also on the acquisition of these conventions by learners (cf. Kasper 1998; Kasper and Rose 1999; Barron 2003: 26–28). The use of second (as opposed to foreign) languages in interaction is studied in postcolonial pragmatics. In other words, this

Application of hermeneutics and transcendental pragmatics in linguistics

The primary characteristics of English pragmatics in Applied Linguistics

Towards Ordinary Language Philosophy: The Linguistic Turn in Line with the Interpretations of M. Bakhtin and M. Heidegger

A New Concept of Pragmatics: A Perspective on Language and Adaptation Theory

Pragmatics in Translation

Context, World of Life and Paradox——Paradox Studies from the View of Hermeneutics and Pragmatics

Translation and the Application of Linguistics

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

The pragmatic turn in law: Inference and interpretation in legal discourse

The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Pragmatics

The pervasive role of pragmatics in early language

INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERACTIONS IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

Pragmatic competence, autistic language use and the basic properties of human language

An interactional approach to speech acts for applied linguistics

The Application of Pragmatic Equivalence Theory in the Practice of Translation

The trend of post-Gricean pragmatics: The rise of the semantics/pragmatics interface study

Variational Pragmatics: Studying the Impact of Social Factors on Language Use in Interaction

Language communication in a pragmatic perspective: Flouting the cooperative principle

The relevance theory, pragmatics and the problem of meaning

Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication