Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership‐driven research
Rachael Cadman,Alanna Syliboy,Michelle Saunders,Shelley Denny,Mary Denniston,Eleanor Barry,Breanna Bishop,Shannon Landovskis,Megan Bailey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14396
IF: 7.563
2024-11-28
Conservation Biology
Abstract:Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the process are a result of researcher upbringing, experiences, access to resources, and values and are a manifestation of positionality. Positionality is a concept that can help one think about one's position and power in one's work. Creating a successful research partnership requires careful thinking about how equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility are accounted for in the research environment. We drew on our own experiences as early career, mid‐career, and Indigenous researchers to explore researcher positionality and how understanding one's positionality can bring to the fore power dynamics in conservation science and research. We focused on the use of reflexive practice to recognize diverse roles and responsibilities, build strong project governance, and enrich relationships. We considered 2 large research partnerships, Apoqnmatulti'k (Mi'kmaw for we help each other) and the SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit (Inuttitut for Sustainable Nunatsiavut Futures) project, to examine moments of tension and interrogation of power and the ways in which this interrogation led to stronger relationships and better research. We advise that large transdisciplinary and cross‐cultural research teams use positionality and reflexivity to explicitly make choices about power dynamics in the context of executing partnership‐driven work. This can be accomplished through personal and collective interrogation of the power dynamics at play in project administration, research questions, and interpersonal relationships. 利用立场性和反思性支持伙伴关系驱动型研究中的公平性 【摘要】 社会和经济地位与权力影响着每个人, 包括科学家和研究人员。研究人员从事保护科学研究的方式以及在这一过程中发出的声音, 是研究人员的成长经历、经验、资源获取途径和价值观的结果, 也是其立场性的体现。立场性的概念可以帮助人们思考自己在工作中的立场和权力。建立成功的研究合作伙伴关系需要认真思考如何在研究环境中考虑公平性、多样性、包容性和可获得性。本研究以作者们自身作为职业生涯早期、中期和土著研究人员的经历为基础, 探讨了研究人员的立场性问题, 以及了解自己的立场性如何能够体现保护科学和研究中的权力动态。我们的重点是利用反思性实践来认识不同的角色和责任, 建立强有力的项目管理, 并丰富人际关系。我们分析了两个大型研究合作项目, 即Apoqnmatulti'k(米克马克语, 意为我们互相帮助)和SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit(因纽特语, 意为可持续的努纳齐亚武特未来)项目, 以研究关系紧张和权力质询的时刻, 以及这种质询如何促成更牢固的关系和更好的研究。我们建议大型跨学科和跨文化研究团队在开展合作驱动型工作时, 利用立场性和反思性明确做出有关权力动态的选择。这可以通过对项目管理、研究问题和人际关系中的权力动态进行个人和集体质询来实现。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology