Abstract:New record efficiency of 14.6% for inorganic tin‐lead perovskite solar cells is reported. Small incorporation of 2D perovskite and temperature‐gradient annealing method assist in the crystallization of this type of 3D perovskite. The optimal proportion of 2D perovskite is determined. X‐ray diffraction of the intermediate phase and time of flight‐secondary ion mass spectrometry measurement reveal the possible crystallization mechanism. Inorganic tin–lead alloyed perovskite solar cells with optimal bandgap have gained increasing attention because of their higher theoretical efficiency limit, inherently robust stability, and potentials in all‐inorganic perovskite tandems. However, their efficiency has far lagged from their Pb‐based counterparts owing to some intractable problems such as poor crystallization and facile Sn2+ oxidation. Here, a small amount of 2D perovskite PEAPb0.7Sn0.3I4 is utilized to regulate the crystallization process of 3D CsPb0.7Sn0.3I3 based on the temperature‐gradient annealing method. The X‐ray diffraction results show that a stable intermediate phase composed of 3D perovskite seeds and 2D phases is formed under a lower annealing temperature of 50 °C, and the pre‐crystallized 3D perovskites can promote the subsequent crystallization upon 80 °C annealing to attain high quality film. It is interesting that the 2D perovskite phase is ultimately mainly located between the 3D perovskite phase and hole transport layer as revealed by the time of flight‐secondary ion mass spectrometry. The resulting perovskite exhibits a lower extent of non‐radiative recombination and better stability. Consequently, the device achieves a champion efficiency of 14.6% setting a new record for inorganic tin‐lead perovskite solar cells (PSCs). This work sheds more light on the future progress of inorganic tin‐lead PSC.

Efficient and Stable Ideal Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cell Achieved by a Small Amount of Tin Substituted Methylammonium Lead Iodide

Ideal Bandgap Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells

Low-bandgap Mixed Tin–lead Iodide Perovskite with Large Grains for High Performance Solar Cells

Inorganic CsPb1−xSnxIBr2 for Efficient Wide‐Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells

Sub-1.4eV bandgap inorganic perovskite solar cells with long-term stability

A Selective Targeting Anchor Strategy Affords Efficient and Stable Ideal‐Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells

Realizing High Efficiency over 20% of Low‐Bandgap Pb–Sn‐Alloyed Perovskite Solar Cells by in Situ Reduction of Sn4+

Stabilized Wide Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells by Tin Substitution

High‐Performance Ideal Bandgap Sn‐Pb Mixed Perovskite Solar Cells Achieved by MXene Passivation

Lewis‐Adduct Mediated Grain‐Boundary Functionalization for Efficient Ideal‐Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability

Methylammonium and Bromide‐Free Tin‐Based Low Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells

Design of Low Bandgap CsPb 1− x Sn x I 2 Br Perovskite Solar Cells with Excellent Phase Stability

Large synergy effects of doping, a site substitution, and surface passivation in wide bandgap Pb-free ASnI2Br perovskite solar cells on efficiency and stability enhancement

Suppressing Bulk and Interfacial Recombination Losses in Sn–Pb Perovskites for Efficient Printable Low‐Bandgap Photovoltaic Devices

Design of Low Bandgap CsPb1-xSnxI2Br Perovskite Solar Cells with Excellent Phase Stability

(Invited) High Efficiency and Low Hysteresis Solar Cells Based on Perovskite with Triple Cation and Mixed Pb-Sn

Sn‐Pb Binary Perovskite Films with High Crystalline Quality for High Performance Solar Cells

Integrated Ideal‐Bandgap Perovskite/Bulk‐Heterojunction Solar Cells with Efficiencies > 24%

Stable Low-Bandgap Pb-Sn Binary Perovskites for Tandem Solar Cells

Efficient Ideal‐Bandgap Tin–Lead Alloyed Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Enabled by Structural Dimension Engineering

Lead-Free Mixed Tin and Germanium Perovskites for Photovoltaic Application