Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative 90Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation

Britt Kunnen,Casper Beijst,Marnix G. E. H. Lam,Max A. Viergever,Hugo W. A. M. de Jong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0283-6

2020-03-04

EJNMMI Physics

Abstract:Abstract Background New digital PET scanners with improved time of flight timing and extended axial field of view such as the Siemens Biograph Vision have come on the market and are expected to replace current generation photomultiplier tube (PMT)-based systems such as the Siemens Biograph mCT. These replacements warrant a direct comparison between the systems, so that a smooth transition in clinical practice and research is guaranteed, especially when quantitative values are used for dosimetry-based treatment guidance. The new generation digital PET scanners offer increased sensitivity. This could particularly benefit 90 Y imaging, which tends to be very noisy owing to the small positron branching ratio and high random fraction of 90 Y. This study aims to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the digital Vision for quantitative 90 Y imaging and to evaluate the image quality and quantification of the digital Vision in comparison with its predecessor, the PMT-based mCT, for 90 Y imaging in radioembolisation procedures. Methods The NEMA image quality phantom was scanned to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the Vision. In addition, an anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with both the Vision and the mCT, mimicking a radioembolisation patient with lung, liver, tumour, and extrahepatic deposition inserts. Image quantification of the anthropomorphic phantom was assessed by the lung shunt fraction, the tumour to non-tumour ratio, the parenchymal dose, and the contrast to noise ratio of extrahepatic depositions. Results For the Vision, a reconstruction with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter is recommended for quantitative 90 Y imaging, based on the convergence of the recovery coefficient. Comparing both systems showed that the noise level of the Vision is significantly lower than that of the mCT (background variability of 14% for the Vision and 25% for the mCT at 2.5·10 3 MBq for the 37 mm sphere size). For quantitative 90 Y measures, such as needed in radioembolisation, both systems perform similarly. Conclusions We recommend to reconstruct 90 Y images acquired on the Vision with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter for quantitative imaging. The Vision provides a reduced noise level, but similar quantitative accuracy as compared with its predecessor the mCT.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging