Abstract:A key problem of eukaryotic cell motility is the signaling mechanism of chemoattractant gradient sensing. Recent experiments have revealed the molecular correlate of gradient sensing: Frontness molecules, such as PI3P and Rac, localize at the front end of the cell, and backness molecules, such as Rho and myosin II, accumulate at the back of the cell. Importantly, this frontness-backness polarization occurs spontaneously even if the cells are exposed to uniform chemoattractant profiles. The spontaneous polarization suggests that the gradient sensing machinery undergoes a Turing bifurcation. This has led to several classical activator-inhibitor and activator-substrate models which identify the frontness molecules with the activator. Conspicuously absent from these models is any accounting of the backness molecules. This stands in sharp contrast to experiments which show that the backness pathways inhibit the frontness pathways. Here, we formulate a model based on the mutually inhibitory interaction between the frontness and backness pathways. The model builds upon the mutual inhibition model proposed by Bourne and coworkers [Xu et al., 2003. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell 114, 201-214.]. We show that mutual inhibition alone, without the help of any positive feedback (autocatalysis), can trigger spontaneous polarization of the frontness and backness pathways. The spatial distribution of the frontness and backness molecules in response to inhibition and activation of the frontness and backness pathways are consistent with those observed in experiments. Furthermore, depending on the parameter values, the model yields spatial distributions corresponding to chemoattraction (frontness pathways in-phase with the external gradient) and chemorepulsion (frontness pathways out-of-phase with the external gradient). Analysis of the model suggests a mechanism for the chemorepulsion-to-chemoattraction transition observed in neurons.

Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Phosphorylation of Gβ is crucial for efficient chemotropism in yeast

Optogenetic control of pheromone gradients reveals functional limits of mating behavior in budding yeast

Spontaneous polarization in eukaryotic gradient sensing: A mathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways

Cell-cycle control of cell polarity in yeast

Relevance of intracellular polarity to accuracy of eukaryotic chemotaxis

Signal transduction and directional sensing in eukaryotes

Effects of 3D Geometries on Cellular Gradient Sensing and Polarization

Spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane surface charge regulates cell polarity and migration

Cdc42 mobility and membrane flows regulate fission yeast cell shape and survival

Mechanochemical modeling of morphogenesis in cell polarization for budding yeast

Topographic Cues Guiding Cell Polarization via Distinct Cellular Mechanosensing Pathways

Energetic constraints on filament mediated cell polarization

Exo-Endocytic Trafficking And The Septin-Based Diffusion Barrier Are Required For The Maintenance Of Cdc42p Polarization During Budding Yeast Asymmetric Growth

Regulation of sexual differentiation initiation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Rebuilding cytoskeleton roads: Active-transport-induced polarization of cells

The G-alpha Gpa1 directs septin localization in the mating projection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through its Ubiquitination Domain and Endocytic Machinery

Crosstalk of cell polarity signaling pathways

Two Complementary Signaling Pathways Depict Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: A Mechanochemical Coupling Model

Engineered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction in probiotic and mating yeasts