Abstract:Objective: To investigate the synergistic regulation of the polarization of mesenchymal stem cells by integrin and N-cadherin-mediated mechanical adhesion and the underlying mechanobiological mechanisms. Methods: Bilayer polyethylene glyeol (PEG) hydrogels were formulated and modified with RGD and HAVDI peptides, respectively, to achieve mechanical adhesion to integrin and N-cadherin and to replicate the integrin-mediated mechanical interaction between cells and the extracellular matrix and the N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell mechanical interaction. The polar proteins, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and phosphorylated myosin light chain (pMLC), were characterized through immunofluorescence staining in individual cells with or without contact with HAVDI peptides under integrin-mediated adhesion, N-cadherin-mediated adhesion, and different intracellular forces. Their expression levels and polar distribution were analyzed using Image J. Results: Integrin-mediated adhesion induced significantly higher polar strengths of PI3K and pMLC in the contact group than in those in the no contact group, resulting in the concentration of the polar angle of PI3K to β-catenin in the range of 135° to 180° and the concentration of the polar angle of pMLC to β-catenin in the range of 0° to 45° in the contact group. Inhibition of integrin function led to inhibition of the polarity distribution of PI3K in the contact group, but did not change the polarity distribution of pMLC protein. The effect of N-cadherin on the polarity distributions of PI3K and pMLC was similar to that of integrin. However, inhibition of the mechanical adhesion of N-cadherin led to inhibition of the polarity intensity and polarity angle distribution of PI3K and pMLC proteins in the contact group. Furthermore, inhibition of the mechanical adhesion of N-cadherin caused weakened polarity intensity of integrin β1, reducing the proportion of cells with polarity angles between integrin β1 and β-catenin concentrating in the range of 135° to 180°. Additionally, intracellular forces influenced the polar distribution of PI3K and pMLC proteins. Reducing intracellular forces weakened the polarity intensity of PI3K and pMLC proteins and their polarity distribution, while increasing intracellular forces enhanced the polarity intensity of PI3K and pMLC proteins and their polarity distribution. Conclusion: Integrin and N-cadherin co-regulate the polarity distribution of cell proteins and N-cadherin can play an important role in the polarity regulation of stem cells through local inhibition of integrin.

Topographic Cues Guiding Cell Polarization via Distinct Cellular Mechanosensing Pathways

Spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane surface charge regulates cell polarity and migration

Chemo-mechanical model of cell polarization initiated by the structural polarity

Mechanical Force Drives the Polarization and Orientation of Cells

A theoretical model of collective cell polarization and alignment

Effects of 3D Geometries on Cellular Gradient Sensing and Polarization

Exploring The Inhibitory Effect Of Membrane Tension On Cell Polarization

Cell Polarization Energy and Its Implications for Cell Migration

Collective cell polarization and alignment on curved surfaces.

Mechanics of Cell Mechanosensing on Patterned Substrate

Dissecting Collective Cell Behavior in Polarization and Alignment on Micropatterned Substrates

Piezoelectric Nanotopography Induced Neuron-Like Differentiation Of Stem Cells

Complementary Cytoskeletal Feedback Loops Control Signal Transduction Excitability and Cell Polarity

Stochastic Fluctuation-Induced Cell Polarization on Elastic Substrates: A Cytoskeleton-Based Mechanical Model

[Integrin and N-cadherin Co-Regulate the Polarity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells via Mechanobiological Mechanisms]

Orientations of Cells on Compliant Substrates under Biaxial Stretches: A Theoretical Study

Polarization of Stem Cells Directed by Magnetic Field-Manipulated Supramolecular Polymeric Nanofibers

Designing Synthetic Regulatory Networks Capable of Self-Organizing Cell Polarization.

Computational Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Coordination of Polarized Pi3k and Rac1 Activities in Micro-Patterned Live Cells

Integration of electrotaxis and durotaxis in cancer cells: Subtle nonlinear responses to electromechanical coupling cues

Rebuilding cytoskeleton roads: Active-transport-induced polarization of cells