Social Distance Factor Related to the Level of Mental Health Awareness Among the Clinicians
Anna Yashikhina,Anna Gradinar,Anastasia Abashkina
Abstract:Background: Stigmatization of morbidity in health care workers, the incidence of disease, the disease that interferes with the disease of medical care. Social distancing by clinicians is an integral part of the stigmatization that depends on the behavior of the patient and the level of awareness of the clinician. Methods: The modified Bogardus Social Distance Self-Assessment Scale (BSDS) was used to evaluate the indicators of social distance phenomena. The assessment was performed by clinicians for the following groups of patients with the following mental disorders: alcohol use disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, drug addiction, epilepsy, mental retardation, schizophrenia. All statistical calculations were performed using IBM SPSS-27 software (IBM Corp. 2021, licensed to Samara State Medical University). P-value ≤ 0.05 was determined as significant for the between-group (PSY vs NPHP) comparisons using a nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: The study included 141 clinicians: PSY (n=20; 36.2±4.2 y.o.) and NPHP (n=121; 25.9±2.2 y.o.). The NPHP group included general practitioners (GP)/physicians (n=29; 20.6%), surgeons (n=19; 13.5%), obstetrician-gynecologists (n=26; 18.4%), neurologists (n=11; 7.8%), pediatricians (n=6; 4.3%), and other subspecialists (including urologists, tuberculosis specialists, ophthalmologists, and dermatologists) (n=30; 21.3%). The study included 141 students at the Samara State Medical University who were trained in psychiatry. An anonymous survey was conducted on the BSDS scale before and after training. Our analysis of the data showed that the social distance of clinicians in terms of coverage reaches different values depending on the mental disorder, but with common trends both before and after the psychiatry training course. Mean (SD) social distance scores recurred from 2.8 (1.3) for bipolar disorder to 5.3 (1.5) for addiction in the predevelopment group and 2.9 (1.3), 5.4 (1.4) in the group of clinicians after training, respectively. Conclusions: Social distancing scores among clinicians in contemporary Russia were highest for drug addicts, and lowest for depression and bipolar disorder. Stigmatization among clinicians appears to affect the delivery of care to certain categories of patients, which requires further study. Higher social distance scores in patients with drug addiction may be associated with higher stigma and lack of compassion towards these patients. Conversely, lower rates of social distancing and the corresponding emotional acceptance of people with depression and bipolar disorder by clinicians may interfere with timely diagnosis and the availability of appropriate early, treatable care. The awareness of clinicians regarding psychopathological manifestations does not affect the level of social distance, but increases it in relation to mentally healthy individuals with normal behavior.