Abstract:In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a number of Shakespeare scholars, including Israel Gollancz (1894), H.R.D. Anders (1904), J. Churton Collins (1904), and Gilbert Murray (1914) wrote convincingly of Shakespeare’s debt to classical Greek drama. However, in the century since, most scholars and editors have repeatedly held that Shakespeare was not familiar with Greek drama. In Classical Mythology in Shakespeare (1903), Robert Kilburn Root expressed the opinion on Shakespeare’s ‘lesse Greek’ that presaged this enduring dismissal: “It is at any rate certain that he nowhere alludes to any characters or episodes of Greek drama, that they extended no influence whatsoever on his conception of mythology.” (p. 6) This century-long consensus against Attic dramatic influence was reinforced by A.D. Nutall, who wrote, “that Shakespeare was cut off from Greek poetry and drama is probably a bleak truth that we should accept.” (Nutall, 2004, p.210) Scholars have preferred to maintain that Plutarch or Ovid were Shakespeare’s surrogate literary mediators for the playwright’s adaptations from Greek myth and theatre. Other scholars, however, have questioned these assumptions, including Laurie Maguire, who observed that “invoking Shakespeare’s imagined conversations in the Mermaid tavern is not a methodology likely to convince skeptics that Shakespeare knew Greek drama.” (p. 98) This near-universal rejection of Greek drama as Shakespeare sources have profound philological implications. Indeed, this essay argues that the proscription against recognizing the Attic canon as an influence in Shakespeare has been driven by the belief that Will Shakspere of Stratford had, at most, an education that was Latin-based. The examples show that the real author had to have been exposed to both the Greek language and the Greek dramatists. Evidence for alternative candidates, including Edward de Vere, shows that many were schooled in Greek and that some even collected and supported translations of Greek works. It is my contention that Shakespeare’s dramatic imagination was actually fired by the Greeks, and Shakespeare research has clearly suffered from a century of denial.

“I haue lost it”: Apologies, Appeals, and Justifications for Misplacing The Wild-Goose Chase and Other Plays

Stage Tricks: Handling Props in Arden of Faversham

"Almost the copy of my child that's dead": Shakespeare and the loss of Hamnet

“The Play’s the Thing”: Re-imagining Shakespeare’s The Tempest in Forbidden Planet, Prospero’s Books and Hag-Seed

Stage Props and Shakespeare’s Comedies

Hamlet: Revenge and the Critical Mirror

To the Life: Resurrection and Presence in The Second Maiden’s Tragedy , Hamlet , and Fat Ham

The play-within-the-film-within-the-play's the thing: re-transmitting analogue bodies in the Wooster Group's Hamlet

Caliban and the fen demons of Lincolnshire: the Englishness of Shakespeare's Tempest

“The dwarf, the fool, the eunuch are all his”: Venice, Carnival, Reproduction and Plague in Volpone

Theatricality and Self-Reflexivity: The Play-within-the-Play in Select Contemporary Irish Plays

Tennessee Williams’s Misunderstood ‘memory play’: Re-Imagining Amanda Wingfield in The Glass Menagerie

A Century of Scholarly Neglect: Shakespeare and Greek Drama

Ghosted and Ancestral Selves in Hamlet: Loewald's "Present Life" and Winnicott's "Potential Space" in Shakespeare's Play

Female Mourning and Tragedy in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama: From the Raising of Lazarus to King Lear. By Katharine

The Economics of Waste in the Knight’s Tale and Late Medieval England

THE MOTIVE OF LOST ILLUSIONS IN W.S. MAUGHAM’S “FOR SERVICES RENDERED” AND J. B. PRESTLEY’S “TIME AND THE CONWAYS”

The wolf, the lamb, and the big "Oh!": voids, (w)holes, and epitaphic emptiness in Frances Burney's Hubert de Vere

George Colman’s The Suicide, A Comedy (1778): A Tale of Two Manuscripts

New and Old Worlds: The Tempest and early colonial discourse

The role of cunning misrepresentations in entrepreneurial impression management