Late syphilis in the primate.

F. Elsas,J. L. Smith,C. Israel,W. E. Gager
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.44.4.267
1968-12-01
Abstract:Recent studies on ocular and neurosyphilis (Smith, Singer, Reynolds, Moore, Yobs, and Clark, 1965; Wells and Smith, 1967; Smith and Israel, 1968) have renewed interest in the primate as an experimental model for treponemal disease. Metchnikoff and Roux (1906) initially studied syphilis in the primate, but investigators soon turned to the rabbit. A partial explanation for this was that some workers felt that the monkey did not develop late syphilitic lesions similar to those seen in man (Turner and Hollander, 1957). The present paper documents the occurrence of a large, crusted late syphiloderm in an owl monkey (Aoitus trivirgatus) infected with virulent Treponema pallidum obtained from a human chancre, and presents the histopathological features of this interesting lesion. The animal also developed non-granulomatous iridocycitis, and T. pallidum organisms were demonstrated in the aqueous humour of the eye. To our knowledge, this is the first report concerned with late syphilis in the experimental primate. On September 22, 1966, a healthy owl monkey (0LCH-2) was inoculated in the right femoral vein with 0 2 ml. serum expressed from a penile chancre of a 23year-old male Negro. Darkfield examination of the chancre material revealed numerous T. pallida of typical morphology and motility. Opportunity for making fresh inoculations from this typical human chancre was provided by Dr Elgin of the Dade County Health Department. The monkey was housed in a separate cage and fed commercial monkey chow and water as desired. Serial clinical and serological examinations were performed thereafter, and during over 18 months of observation, the animal was given no medication. The serological data are presented in Table I. Suffice it to say here, that unequivocal sero-conversion was documented in this animal, reactive VDRL, TPI, and FTA-ABS tests being obtained. The FTA-ABS test converted at 4 months and the VDRL test at 8 months after inoculation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?