SILARS: an Effective S Table I Sotope L Abeling with A Mmonium Nitrate- 15 N in R Ice S Eedlings for Quantitative Proteomic Analysis
Shixiang Yao,Yu Zhang,Yuling Chen,Haiteng Deng,Jinyuan Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu089
2014-01-01
Abstract:Dear Editor, In recent years, the proteomics field has been transformed from charting static proteomes to examining their dynamics by simultaneously quantifying multiple proteins from different experimental samples. Accurate quantification of differences in protein expression levels is essential for comparative proteomics and is becoming an integral and important part of modern experimental biological science (Simicevic et al., 2013Simicevic J. Schmid A.W. Gilardoni P.A. Zoller B. Raghav S.K. Krier I. Gubelmann C. Lisacek F. Naef F. Moniatte M. et al.Absolute quantification of transcription factors during cellular differentiation using multiplexed targeted proteomics.Nat. Methods. 2013; 10: 570-576Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar). Advanced mass spectrometry (MS) provides a powerful means for achieving quantitative proteomics data, and the preferred approach is to use metabolic labeling with stable isotopes (Gouw et al., 2010Gouw J.W. Krijgsveld J. Heck A.J. Quantitative proteomics by metabolic labeling of model organisms.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2010; 9: 11-24Crossref PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar). In metabolic labeling, heavy stable isotope labels are introduced in vivo by growing cells or entire organisms in the presence of amino acids or nutrients carrying these isotopes. Introducing the heavy isotope label results in a predictable mass difference between a labeled peptide and its unlabeled counterpart, and relative protein quantification is obtained by comparing the signal intensities of the unlabeled/labeled peptide pairs of a given protein. The labeled and unlabeled samples are combined prior to sample preparation, thus avoiding sample-to-sample variation that may occur during experimental handling. Currently, several metabolic labeling-based methods are widely used in quantitative proteomics studies. Of these, in vivo15N-metabolic labeling holds great potential for quantitative proteomics in animal and plant models. The first metabolic labeling was conducted in 15N-enriched media to grow yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Oda et al., 1999Oda Y. Huang K. Cross F.R. Cowburn D. Chait B.T. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U S A. 1999; 96: 6591-6596Crossref PubMed Scopus (940) Google Scholar), and the method was extended to prokaryotic photosynthetic Cyanobacterium (Whitelegge, 2004Whitelegge J.P. Mass spectrometry for high throughput quantitative proteomics in plant research: lessons from thylakoid membranes.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004; 42: 919-927Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar) and multicellular non-plant organisms, such as Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and mammalian cells (for review, see Gouw et al., 2010Gouw J.W. Krijgsveld J. Heck A.J. Quantitative proteomics by metabolic labeling of model organisms.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2010; 9: 11-24Crossref PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar). In multicellular terrestrial plants, the first 15N stable isotope metabolic labeling was performed using hydroponic setup for proteomic analysis in potato plant (Ippel et al., 2004Ippel J.H. Pouvreau L. Kroef T. Gruppen H. Versteeg G. vanden Putten P. Struik P.C. van Mierlo C.P.M. In vivo uniform 15N-isotope labeling of plants: using the greenhouse for structural proteomics.Proteomics. 2004; 4: 226-234Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar), PTM proteomics in Arabidopsis (Benschop et al., 2007Benschop J.J. Mohammed S. O'Flaherty M. Heck A.J.R. Slijper M. Menke F.L.H. Quantitative phospho-proteomics of early elicitor signalling in Arabidopsis.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2007; 6: 1198-1214Crossref PubMed Scopus (539) Google Scholar) and using 15N-enriched soil for quantitative proteomics in adult tomato plants (Schaff et al., 2008Schaff J.E. Mbeunkui F. Blackburn K. Bird D.M. Goshe M.B. SILIP: a novel stable isotope labeling method for in planta quantitative proteomic analysis.Plant J. 2008; 56: 840-854Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar). Simultaneously, the 15N, 13C, and 2H stable isotope labeling was applied to Arabidopsis cell suspension culture (Gruhler et al., 2005Gruhler A. Schulze W.X. Matthiesen R. Mann M. Jensen O.N. Stable isotope labeling of Arabidopsis thaliana cells and quantitative proteomics by mass spectrometry.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2005; 4: 1697-1709Crossref PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar; Engelsberger et al., 2006Engelsberger W.R. Erban A. Kopka J. Schulze W.X. Metabolic labeling of plant cell cultures with K15NO3 as a tool for quantitative analysis of proteins and metabolites.Plant Methods. 2006; 2: 14Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar) for various proteomics studies. Since then, different 15N-labeling techniques have been established for Arabidopsis seedlings and flowering plants grown in liquid medium and on solid agar medium, respectively (Huttlin et al., 2007Huttlin E.L. Hegeman A.D. Harms A.C. Sussman M.R. Comparison of full versus partial metabolic labeling for quantitative proteomics analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana.Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2007; 6: 860-881Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar; Guo and Li, 2011Guo G. Li N. Relative and accurate measurement of protein abundance using 15N stable isotope labeling in Arabidopsis (SILIA).Phytochemistry. 2011; 72: 1028-1039Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar). However, no reports have been documented to show successful metabolic 15N-labeling of a single economically important cereal crop, such as rice for quantitative proteomics analysis. The reason may be due to the larger endosperm in rice seed, which hinders the efficient 15N-metabolic labeling of rice plant. The conspicuous differences existing in between rice and Arabidopsis are the seed size and the growth rate, suggesting that the replacement of endogenous 14N with exogenously supplied 15N may be limited (Supplemental Figure 1). As expected, when rice seedlings were hydroponically grown in nutrient solutions supplemented with 15N-labeled salts (>98%) for 45 d, 15N incorporation was found to be low (data not shown), which is consistent with previous studies (Muhammad and Kumazawa, 1974Muhammad S. Kumazawa K. The absorption, distribution, and redistribution of 15N-labelled ammonium and nitrate nitrogen administered at different growth stages of rice.Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1974; 20: 47-55Crossref Scopus (18) Google Scholar). In general, the incorporation rates of stable isotopes below 90% prevent accurate quantitative proteomic analysis due to imprecise and inefficient quantitation (Frank et al., 2009). Thus, more improvement is needed for changing the labeling efficiency for quantitative rice proteomics because in vivo15N metabolic labeling holds great potential for quantitative proteomics in cereal crops because of their economic importance. To verify the assumption regarding endosperm disturbance, the endosperm was removed (Figure 1A), and the seedlings were hydroponically cultivated in Yoshida nutrient solution (Type I) or modified Yoshida solution (Type II) (Supplemental Table 1) for up to 28 d under normal conditions. The rice seedlings did not grow well in either solution after endosperm removal and showed poor growth phenotypes, including yellow-green leaf in Type II and coiled leaf in Type I (Supplemental Figure 2A). Interestingly, the fresh weight of the roots of plants grown in Type II was greater than that of plants grown in Type I (p < 0.05), while no significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the fresh weights of the shoots (Supplemental Figure 2A). Thus, Type II is conducive to the growth of rice roots. Finally, we discovered a method of solution exchange that allowed rice seedlings to grow well. Seedlings were grown in Type II for the first 14 d followed by growth in Type I for another 14 d, with solution exchange every 2 d throughout 28 d of growth (Figure 1C). The addition of 30mM sucrose to the solution during the first 2 d of growth prevented growth inhibition in young seedlings. Using the above-presented procedures, rice seedlings were 15N-labeled by growing the seedlings in a set of hydroponic solutions containing 15N-labeled ammonium nitrate (15NH415NO3) as the sole nitrogen source under optimal light and temperature conditions. No phenotypic differences were observed between seedlings hydroponically grown with 15N-labeled ammonium nitrate or normal ammonium nitrate (14NH414NO3) after 21 d (Figure 1B). Furthermore, no significant differences in height or mass were detected for 28-day-old seedlings grown in 14N- or 15N-enriched culture solutions (Supplemental Figure 2B). Next, the labeling efficiency of seedlings grown in 14N- or 15N-enriched culture solution for various growing periods were examined using an LTQ-Velos Orbitrap mass spectrometer (see methods in Supplementary Data). As expected, the efficiency of label incorporation increased at a steady pace from 86.8% ± 4.11 to 92.5% ± 1.96 over the extended growth period of 21–28 d, as indicated by the doubly charged peptide of the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain precursor (Figure 1D and 1E). Furthermore, the 15N labeling levels in leaves, stems, and roots were measured in 28 day-after-germination (DAG) seedlings, and the mean values were 91.9% ± 2.25, 92.4% ± 2.46, and 93.2% ± 2.37, respectively, indicating that the 15N-enrichment in roots was slightly higher (Figure 1E). The average incorporation of a stable isotope, >90%, was the highest level reported for rice and was sufficient to quantify peptides using ProLuCID (McClatchy et al., 2007McClatchy D.B. Dong M.Q. Wu C.C. Venable J.D. Yates J.R. 15N metabolic labeling of mammalian tissue with slow protein turnover.J. Proteome Res. 2007; 6: 2005-2010Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). After effective stable isotope labeling with ammonium nitrate-15N in rice seedlings (SILARS) was achieved, we performed a reciprocal labeling experiment (Supplemental Figure 3) in which 15N-labeled seedlings (labeled at 92%) were mixed with unlabeled (14N) seedlings in five different ratios ranging from 1:4 to 4:1 (14N:15N) to address the accuracy of the quantitation. The ratios of labeled and unlabeled peptide pairs were indeed similar to the expected ratios (Supplemental Table 2). Due to the labeling efficiency and stochastic precursor-ion/fragment-ion selection, proteomic quantification is not as straightforward for automated high-throughput analysis. On average, nearly 80% of all identified proteins in all the measured samples were quantified, and the average intensity ratios of all quantified proteins were not significantly different from the expected values. As indicated by the 1:1 ratio sample, selection of the optimal mixing ratio leads to higher quantitation accuracies and sensitivity (Supplemental Table 2). Our quantitation accuracy is similar to that reported for 15N-labeled Arabidopsis cell culture experiments (Engelsberger et al., 2006Engelsberger W.R. Erban A. Kopka J. Schulze W.X. Metabolic labeling of plant cell cultures with K15NO3 as a tool for quantitative analysis of proteins and metabolites.Plant Methods. 2006; 2: 14Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). To illustrate the utility of this method, we combined higher labeling efficiency with quantitative proteomic analysis of seedlings exposed to a moderate concentration of H2O2 and identified 389 proteins whose expression levels were significantly altered compared to the same proteins in untreated controls; thus, the utilization of SILARS with 15N-enriched growth solutions could identify more proteins with dynamic expression profiles compared to 2-DE/MS or iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic approaches (see results in Supplementary Data). In conclusion, using a strategy of endosperm excision and optimization of hydroponic nutrient solutions, we successfully established a SILARS method to metabolically label entire rice seedlings for quantitative proteomics. Efficient labeling of entire rice seedlings using this method allows for accurately determining protein expression levels in rice seedlings and facilitates the quantitative analysis of proteins that are important for biological processes in rice. Furthermore, this method may facilitate extending 15N-labeling-based quantitative proteomics to other cereal plants. Supplementary data are available at Molecular Plant Online. This work was supported by grants from the State Key Basic Research and Development Plan (2010CB126003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (90608016), and the National Transgenic Animals and Plants Research Project (2009ZX08009-069B, 2011ZX08005-003, and 2011ZX08009-003).